|
|
Post by lpopman on Oct 22, 2011 9:10:07 GMT -5
@admiral Lithp: "* Easily distracted by bright lights & loud noises." c'mon don't lump us OCD/ADHD/ADD people in with the manchildren, ploxx. Apart from that, nice description  |
|
|
|
Post by Admiral Lithp on Oct 22, 2011 18:16:41 GMT -5
I've got a million of 'em. You could say I had a case study recently.
|
|
|
|
Post by MaybeNever on Oct 22, 2011 18:24:59 GMT -5
- Uses the phrase "no homo" in an non-ironic fashion. - Thinks "sandwich" and "kitchen" jokes have ever been funny and original. Logically, at SOME point they must have been original. Whether or not they were ever actually funny is, of course, an entirely different kettle of fish. |
|
|
|
Post by Wykked Wytch on Oct 22, 2011 20:30:12 GMT -5
|
|
jjames
New Member
ARE YOU SPYING ON ME!?
Posts: 20
|
Post by jjames on Oct 23, 2011 17:34:45 GMT -5
*Has an extremely dim awareness of the existence/legitimacy of cultures outside of his/her own
*Parrots victory memes, badly, when (s)he hasn't even won anything
* If his/her ass has been nailed to the wall by a particularly powerful, point-by-point refutation, the Manchild's response is to ignore it, change the subject, derail the conversation, or continue pointlessly arguing over a single point in the refutation while refusing to acknowledge the rest of the damning argument
* Is intensely loyal to some interest beyond all logic or reason, for example the SuperAwsomeGreatness of the Boeing 747 versus the Antonov AN-225, or Americuh won WW2 and not those damn Commies, or Archaeopteryx is like, totally 100% bird or totally, like, 100% dinosaur, on and on ad infinitum
* Believes silly things with no proof whatsoever, like Homeopathy or Jesus or Allah or White Superiority or Rush Limbaugh's complete innocence in the LRA scandal
* Grammar, reading comprehension and spelling are optional
|
|
|
|
Post by Admiral Lithp on Oct 23, 2011 17:58:23 GMT -5
Fixed.
*Complains that everyone criticizing him is persecuting him/trolling/trying to destroy the thread, ignoring his own participation.
*Goes on about Freedom of Speech, missing little subtleties like etiquette or the fact that it doesn't apply online.
*Tout the rules when they're in his favor, ignore or even rebel against them when they are not.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dragon Zachski on Oct 24, 2011 21:40:15 GMT -5
*Thinks that people disagreeing with him is violating his right to Freedom of Speech
|
|
|
|
Post by Mlle Antéchrist on Oct 24, 2011 21:46:41 GMT -5
*Thinks that people disagreeing with him is violating his right to Freedom of Speech Had to deal with one of these the other day. He lost his shit and blocked me when I pointed out that freedom of speech =/= freedom from being disagreed with. |
|
|
|
Post by lighthorseman on Oct 24, 2011 22:03:28 GMT -5
Makes passive aggressive posts in threads like this
|
|
|
|
Post by Mlle Antéchrist on Oct 24, 2011 22:06:26 GMT -5
Lithp & LHM: Please stop derailing threads with your hatesex.
|
|
|
|
Post by clockworkgirl21 on Oct 25, 2011 2:34:06 GMT -5
I seem to be a womanchild.
|
|
|
|
Post by Admiral Lithp on Oct 25, 2011 18:55:01 GMT -5
My favorite part is the part where all of my examples come from another board.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dragon Zachski on Oct 26, 2011 1:48:24 GMT -5
Makes passive aggressive posts in threads like this Such as this one? |
|
|
|
Post by Haseen on Oct 26, 2011 3:49:12 GMT -5
Claims to do it more like this in a way that's intended to be ironic, but rings more true than he could ever hope to realize.
|
|
|
|
Post by Wykked Wytch on Oct 27, 2011 19:57:06 GMT -5
- Whenever a case involving a rape or sexual harassment of a woman comes up, the first question he asks is, "Well, what was she wearing?"
|
|
