|
Post by secretsquirrelsock on Jan 13, 2010 6:20:27 GMT -5
By DMCA, dasfuchs means an infringement of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. Oh. OK. So... how does VFX et al use these or issue these or whatever. Sorry, but I'm utterly unfamiliar with the action being discussed. Thanks for the FYI
|
|
|
Post by Mantorok on Jan 13, 2010 6:49:02 GMT -5
There's an option on Youtube to flag a video as infringing on your copyright.
|
|
|
Post by deusmalum on Jan 13, 2010 12:05:00 GMT -5
Would someone please summarize the video statement, for those of us who cannot view/hear it? Thanks. ~David D.G. He claims that he, Thunderf00t, some guy named DVRJones*, & TheAmazingAtheist are all in contact with Shawn's parents. He goes on to say that Shawn's dodgy behavior is because he's living at his college dorm and his parents have threatened to cut him off financially. *=Shawn apparently got this guy's account suspended. It is interesting if true. YouTube is like some kind of nerdy Soap Opera. If you're transcribing off of the video, the asterisked poster is almost certainly dprjones, rather than dvrjones.
|
|
|
Post by captainhooker on Jan 13, 2010 13:14:29 GMT -5
Whoever it is reading on that video looks exactly like an old friend of mine, Jonathon Wimpee - one hell of a musician, btw.
|
|
|
Post by RavynousHunter on Jan 13, 2010 13:21:58 GMT -5
He looks...like me. And that's fucking scary. (the guy in the video, that is.)
|
|
|
Post by Thejebusfire on Jan 13, 2010 16:05:48 GMT -5
I used to think that VFX just needed some thearpy, but now I see even that isn't going to work on him.
|
|
|
Post by dasfuchs on Jan 13, 2010 17:49:40 GMT -5
By DMCA, dasfuchs means an infringement of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. Oh. OK. So... how does VFX et al use these or issue these or whatever. Sorry, but I'm utterly unfamiliar with the action being discussed. Thanks for the FYI Basically it's copyright. VFX claims that people used parts of his videos without consent which violates copyright...but, the clause that makes his complaints fraudulent is that it does not apply if used for things like comedy or critique
|
|
|
Post by Admiral Lithp on Jan 13, 2010 22:36:09 GMT -5
He claims that he, Thunderf00t, some guy named DVRJones*, & TheAmazingAtheist are all in contact with Shawn's parents. He goes on to say that Shawn's dodgy behavior is because he's living at his college dorm and his parents have threatened to cut him off financially. *=Shawn apparently got this guy's account suspended. It is interesting if true. YouTube is like some kind of nerdy Soap Opera. If you're transcribing off of the video, the asterisked poster is almost certainly dprjones, rather than dvrjones. I was close. Anyone have a link for this?
|
|
|
Post by Mantorok on Jan 13, 2010 23:46:17 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by dasfuchs on Jan 14, 2010 4:07:08 GMT -5
If you're transcribing off of the video, the asterisked poster is almost certainly dprjones, rather than dvrjones. I was close. Anyone have a link for this? I gave one, reed moar
|
|
|
Post by gotpwnt on Jan 14, 2010 16:40:29 GMT -5
DPRJones Shawn filled DMCAs against him, and unlike Shawn, this guy is a very real lawyer who ended up pawning Shawn, Shawn sucked ass to him trying to stop legal action, but DPR gave him 10 days to delete Shawn's account or face legal action against those false DMCAs, so Shawn quit. No doubt he'll pop up ater as he always does Cait You know he scammed money too right? He claimed he was running a charity drive for some group and ended up spending the money on tuition and a car for himself? Canadian authorities were not happy Lol, wow, after leaving, shawn used his sock accounts to flag DPR's vids and filed another DMCA against him as of the 11th, just before this vid about his dad surfaced...and apparently he's still filing DMCA's...I hope DPR goes through with the countersuits just so Shawn can be seen for the mental shithead he is and locked away in therapy Not just this, apparently, before PCS shut his main account down, he claimed DPRJones had showed Pedophile Porn on BlogTV. As the story goes, DPRJones and a few other held a charity for Doctors Without Borders, and if a certain amount was reached, someone was showin tits. The amount was reached and someone did indeed show tits. VFX claims this girl was 17 and thus the material qualifies as Child Porn. In reality under UK law, she would still be an adult but that doesn't matter, since the women in question is actually 27. From what I gather, DPRJones is already in the process of filing a Lawsuit.
|
|
|
Post by dasfuchs on Jan 14, 2010 17:00:39 GMT -5
DPRJones Shawn filled DMCAs against him, and unlike Shawn, this guy is a very real lawyer who ended up pawning Shawn, Shawn sucked ass to him trying to stop legal action, but DPR gave him 10 days to delete Shawn's account or face legal action against those false DMCAs, so Shawn quit. No doubt he'll pop up ater as he always does Cait You know he scammed money too right? He claimed he was running a charity drive for some group and ended up spending the money on tuition and a car for himself? Canadian authorities were not happy Lol, wow, after leaving, shawn used his sock accounts to flag DPR's vids and filed another DMCA against him as of the 11th, just before this vid about his dad surfaced...and apparently he's still filing DMCA's...I hope DPR goes through with the countersuits just so Shawn can be seen for the mental shithead he is and locked away in therapy Not just this, apparently, before PCS shut his main account down, he claimed DPRJones had showed Pedophile Porn on BlogTV. As the story goes, DPRJones and a few other held a charity for Doctors Without Borders, and if a certain amount was reached, someone was showin tits. The amount was reached and someone did indeed show tits. VFX claims this girl was 17 and thus the material qualifies as Child Porn. In reality under UK law, she would still be an adult but that doesn't matter, since the women in question is actually 27. From what I gather, DPRJones is already in the process of filing a Lawsuit. Yeah, I read about that, that's how they found out VFX was using school computers for this stuff because the e-mail VFX received from an "anonymous source" (himself) came from the school's web address For being a christian, he sure is a dirty underhanded son of a bitch
|
|
|
Post by ironbite on Jan 14, 2010 19:47:04 GMT -5
So he's exactly like a fundie.
|
|
|
Post by Admiral Lithp on Jan 14, 2010 20:56:14 GMT -5
DPRJones Shawn filled DMCAs against him, and unlike Shawn, this guy is a very real lawyer who ended up pawning Shawn, Shawn sucked ass to him trying to stop legal action, but DPR gave him 10 days to delete Shawn's account or face legal action against those false DMCAs, so Shawn quit. No doubt he'll pop up ater as he always does Cait You know he scammed money too right? He claimed he was running a charity drive for some group and ended up spending the money on tuition and a car for himself? Canadian authorities were not happy Lol, wow, after leaving, shawn used his sock accounts to flag DPR's vids and filed another DMCA against him as of the 11th, just before this vid about his dad surfaced...and apparently he's still filing DMCA's...I hope DPR goes through with the countersuits just so Shawn can be seen for the mental shithead he is and locked away in therapy Not just this, apparently, before PCS shut his main account down, he claimed DPRJones had showed Pedophile Porn on BlogTV. As the story goes, DPRJones and a few other held a charity for Doctors Without Borders, and if a certain amount was reached, someone was showin tits. The amount was reached and someone did indeed show tits. VFX claims this girl was 17 and thus the material qualifies as Child Porn. In reality under UK law, she would still be an adult but that doesn't matter, since the women in question is actually 27. From what I gather, DPRJones is already in the process of filing a Lawsuit. Shawn has the nerve to pull that kind of stunt after a charity scam? Wow, what a douche. I can't believe so many people love the guy.
|
|
|
Post by dasfuchs on Jan 15, 2010 2:33:41 GMT -5
I'm sure it comes down to the morons that think "Well, he's railing against these people, so he must be on my side, so insta love". Normally that's how fundies work anyways, if it rails on the people they oppose, then it must be on their side and one of them
The best time this occours is when it's a muslim that they accept without knowing it because he's railing on an athiest and then watch the fallout from it. I have witnessed this once, the fallout lasted 20 pages and was hysterical....like a George Carlin version of Waterworld where they discover the dude's a mutant
|
|