|
Post by tygerarmy on Apr 21, 2011 22:32:16 GMT -5
"Don't Taze Me Bro!" got tazed because he was physically resisting restraint and being an utter prick. This guy? He was holding a peaceful protest and there's no law against being in your underwear. He voluntarily submitted to a strip search. Unfortunately, the people who have no control over a situation may sometimes have to undergo mild discomfort. It's not like the guy tried to do anything to specifically target the TSA agent. And why does it fucking matter what his motivation was? So fucking what if he wants attention or an "easy" $250,000? If his actions can get rid of the completely needless TSA "security" procedures, why should it be of any importance if he was doing it for fame or money? Sometimes the motivation takes a back seat to the ends. Exactly, I thought about going to the airport in my underwear or just PT shorts. And it wouldn't be for an easy lump some of money. But then if I was arrested for doing so I'd take action. Whatever would be necessary.
|
|
|
Post by booley on Apr 24, 2011 13:44:39 GMT -5
There's a difference between sitting peacefully at lunch counter and showily stripping to your underpants in the middle of a crowded airport. .... Yes. One is much easier to ignore then the other. I think we need to remember, MLK did not just sit at lunch counter. He understood political theatre and set up situations where the other side either had to give in or be true to their abominable practices and be seen as the complete douche bags they are. Also correct me if I wrong but this guy was also peaceful. Stripping is a non-violent act. BTW-am I the only one who's kind of happy they included pictures? Just checking
|
|
|
Post by wmdkitty on Apr 25, 2011 1:05:19 GMT -5
Mmm... AND he's eye-candy!
|
|
|
Post by dakotabob on Apr 25, 2011 6:00:45 GMT -5
Thank's for defending America's freedoms, Ashton Kutcher!
|
|
|
Post by rookie on Apr 26, 2011 13:39:46 GMT -5
Thank's for defending America's freedoms, Ashton Kutcher! I'm lad I'm not the only one who thought that.
|
|