|
|
Post by Julian on May 5, 2009 3:48:10 GMT -5
Surely, unless every verse of every chapter of all 66 books is written in totally clear, utterly unambiguous language that can only possibly have one clear meaning, they're always open to interpretations. And given that Christianity isn't centralised in one denomination, this probably means RR's rule on this can only be bullshit. Especially considering the ludicrous and laughable interpretations our current rr visitor is coming up with... Therefore it should read. Our private interpretations are the true Word of God in its entirety and fullness, are perfect without error and not open to discussion. |
|
|
|
Post by erictheblue on May 5, 2009 6:31:53 GMT -5
Why are you so interested in buttsecks??? Because, quite honestly, I NEVER think about gay sex unless some fundie brings it up. So WHY are you so fascinated with what gay people are doing between the sheets/on the kitchen table/in the shower/behind your hedges?   ;D And to follow up... Why don't you ever rant about two women having sex? |
|
|
|
Post by anonymous on May 5, 2009 9:14:32 GMT -5
Why are you so interested in buttsecks??? Because, quite honestly, I NEVER think about gay sex unless some fundie brings it up. So WHY are you so fascinated with what gay people are doing between the sheets/on the kitchen table/in the shower/behind your hedges? ;D And to follow up... Why don't you ever rant about two women having sex? Why would two women ever have sex? Women don't enjoy sex unless there is babymaking involved  |
|
|
|
Post by erictheblue on May 5, 2009 9:41:43 GMT -5
And to follow up... Why don't you ever rant about two women having sex? Why would two women ever have sex? Women don't enjoy sex unless there is babymaking involved +1 And have a cookie. |
|
|
|
Post by wackadoodle on May 5, 2009 10:28:18 GMT -5
Looks like he's run off to go hide behind the RR mods. I dont know if it was the utter BS about them not hating gays *no one who supports gay marriage is gonna survive on RR*or the utter BS about evolution but he's remembered this is a board that doesnt instantly ban anyone who disagrees and that seems to have spooked him.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hades on May 5, 2009 11:31:14 GMT -5
Looks like he's run off to go hide behind the RR mods. I dont know if it was the utter BS about them not hating gays *no one who supports gay marriage is gonna survive on RR*or the utter BS about evolution but he's remembered this is a board that doesnt instantly ban anyone who disagrees and that seems to have spooked him. Agreed. He may have seen that we allow people like him to explain their side and he knows he has nothing to back up his parroted crap. Especially when we have people like Vene who can call him on it very well. |
|
|
|
Post by erictheblue on May 5, 2009 11:50:45 GMT -5
he's remembered this is a board that doesnt instantly ban anyone who disagrees and that seems to have spooked him. I wonder if that was his goal - come here, rattle off crap, get banned, then run back to RR and tell everyone how "evil" we are because we "banned him for telling The Truth tm." |
|
|
|
Post by antichrist on May 5, 2009 12:10:30 GMT -5
Ooooh, I just thought of a good one.
If one sin makes you a sinner, why doesn't it work the other way? Why doesn't one good deed make you good?
|
|
shrike
Junior Member
Polyamorous Atheist
Posts: 56
|
Post by shrike on May 5, 2009 12:56:53 GMT -5
Ooooh, I just thought of a good one. If one sin makes you a sinner, why doesn't it work the other way? Why doesn't one good deed make you good? Easy. It would make their religion unnecessary. |
|
|
|
Post by shiftyeyes on May 5, 2009 19:51:36 GMT -5
How do you know which parts of the bible to take literally and which parts are meant symbolically and require more context?
|
|
|
|
Post by dasfuchs on May 6, 2009 1:43:17 GMT -5
he's remembered this is a board that doesnt instantly ban anyone who disagrees and that seems to have spooked him. I wonder if that was his goal - come here, rattle off crap, get banned, then run back to RR and tell everyone how "evil" we are because we "banned him for telling The Truth tm." Not only would he be a huge sack of fail, but also know he was pwnd big time in the ban area |
|
|
|
Post by Dr. Waldorf X on May 6, 2009 2:55:19 GMT -5
I wonder if that was his goal - come here, rattle off crap, get banned, then run back to RR and tell everyone how "evil" we are because we "banned him for telling The Truth tm." Not only would he be a huge sack of fail, but also know he was pwnd big time in the ban area While I'm sure we'd all get kicks from ridiculing him, would we ban him for anything beyond what proboards doesn't want? |
|
|
|
Post by clockworkgirl21 on May 6, 2009 4:29:12 GMT -5
Here are my favorites from that thread...
|
|
|
|
Post by deliciousdemon on May 6, 2009 5:34:37 GMT -5
I wouldn't bother, I have better things to do. I know that is anthropologically speaking, lazy, but sometimes you just have to compartamentalise.
|
|
|
|
Post by erictheblue on May 6, 2009 6:46:45 GMT -5
Not only would he be a huge sack of fail, but also know he was pwnd big time in the ban area While I'm sure we'd all get kicks from ridiculing him, would we ban him for anything beyond what proboards doesn't want? No, which is the point. He wanted to get banned so he could complain, but the mods here don't ban just for disagreeing or being a troll. |
|
;D
