|
Post by caseagainstfaith on Oct 28, 2011 16:06:18 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by gyeonghwa on Oct 28, 2011 16:29:44 GMT -5
They'll still have their place in history as the people who helped fucked us over.
|
|
|
Post by ironbite on Oct 28, 2011 17:57:19 GMT -5
Yeah there is that. But when you're so dumb that the dumbest people who support you seem to think you're too dumb for them...
Ironbite-might want to rethink your life.
|
|
|
Post by N. De Plume on Oct 28, 2011 18:17:50 GMT -5
Real problems? I was under the impression tea party values involved trying to solve imaginary problems.
|
|
|
Post by Aqualung on Oct 28, 2011 22:10:02 GMT -5
That is all.
|
|
|
Post by The_L on Oct 29, 2011 15:50:31 GMT -5
Aqualung, that LOL is disturbingly mesmerizing.
Also, Damen says that you win the internet.
|
|
|
Post by MaybeNever on Oct 29, 2011 21:35:09 GMT -5
Real problems? I was under the impression tea party values involved trying to solve imaginary problems. This was the first thing I noticed too. Although I love the hypocrisy: someone in a movement that is dedicated to intolerant narcissistic Mammonism is using the movement to make money and get attention? BURN THE HERETIC!
|
|
|
Post by dasfuchs on Oct 30, 2011 0:13:57 GMT -5
Hahaha, Bachmann is too insane for the Tea Party...man, I guess that raises my respect for the TP to -9,843,670,569,250,967,238,965,342,945,689,756,983,246 from -9,843,670,569,250,967,238,965,342,945,689,756,983,247
|
|
|
Post by tolpuddlemartyr on Oct 30, 2011 3:45:26 GMT -5
But shitty grammar will never fail them!
|
|
|
Post by Vypernight on Oct 30, 2011 3:57:56 GMT -5
Good, now get rid of Perry and the rest. Cain's in the lead, and if he wins the primaries, this election could actually be interesting. I'm still probably voting for either Obama or none of the above, but at least it'd be an interesting election.
|
|
|
Post by VirtualStranger on Oct 30, 2011 9:49:26 GMT -5
Hahaha, Bachmann is too insane for the Tea Party...man, I guess that raises my respect for the TP to -9,843,670,569,250,967,238,965,342,945,689,756,983,246 from -9,843,670,569,250,967,238,965,342,945,689,756,983,247 Hint: That's actually a decrease.
|
|
|
Post by Vene on Oct 30, 2011 10:11:16 GMT -5
Hahaha, Bachmann is too insane for the Tea Party...man, I guess that raises my respect for the TP to -9,843,670,569,250,967,238,965,342,945,689,756,983,246 from -9,843,670,569,250,967,238,965,342,945,689,756,983,247 Hint: That's actually a decrease. No, it's not. -7 is less than -6.
|
|
|
Post by VirtualStranger on Oct 30, 2011 10:13:11 GMT -5
Hahaha, Bachmann is too insane for the Tea Party...man, I guess that raises my respect for the TP to -9,843,670,569,250,967,238,965,342,945,689,756,983,246 from -9,843,670,569,250,967,238,965,342,945,689,756,983,247 Whoops... I think my brain just switched these two words.
|
|
|
Post by Smurfette Principle on Oct 30, 2011 10:57:22 GMT -5
Hint: That's actually a decrease. No, it's not. -7 is less than -6. Yes, which is why it's a decrease. On a number line: -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 A number is "more" on a positive scale when it's away from zero and "more" on a negative scale when it's closer to zero. Basically, if it's going to the right on a number line, it is increasing, and if it's going left, it's decreasing. So, on this number line, we have -6. -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Move to -7: <-------8 -7 -6-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 It's moving farther away from zero, so it is decreasing.If your respect for the Tea Party is going up, then it gets closer to zero (moves to the right), which means we go from -6: -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 To -5: ------>-8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 This message brought to you today by Defending Algebra with Mathematical Nitpicks.
|
|
|
Post by Dragon Zachski on Oct 30, 2011 13:09:03 GMT -5
Smurfette, the first of the numbers is the result, and the second number is the original.
You've got them switched.
|
|