|
Post by A Reasonable Rat on Nov 7, 2011 1:29:17 GMT -5
So there's some guy on Youtube making a bunch of videos about how Richard Dawkins doesn't believe in the existence of raspberries. I was just wondering if there was any reason they chose raspberries... like did someone in that peer group say something about not knowing what they are? Or was it just an arbitrary object? Also, these are a lame Seth McFarlane design ripoff. and darn lulzy.
|
|
|
Post by Mlle Antéchrist on Nov 7, 2011 1:43:31 GMT -5
I'm less than ten seconds into this, and already nerd-raging over the monkey/ape mix-up.
|
|
|
Post by A Reasonable Rat on Nov 7, 2011 12:49:23 GMT -5
I think they do it on purpose to piss us off. There's no way these people haven't been corrected at least once on the ape/monkey issue.
|
|
|
Post by Admiral Lithp on Nov 7, 2011 23:49:44 GMT -5
Most Fundies just don't care. They claim not to see the difference. It doesn't help that the YouTubers have differing levels of knowledge on the subject & the Fundies wouldn't be sure who to listen to if they actually WERE interested in honest discussion.
"Believing in raspberries is a religion like not collecting stamps is a hobby."
...Yeah?
|
|
|
Post by mexicandruglord on Dec 13, 2011 6:16:48 GMT -5
So there's some guy on Youtube making a bunch of videos about how Richard Dawkins doesn't believe in the existence of raspberries. I was just wondering if there was any reason they chose raspberries... like did someone in that peer group say something about not knowing what they are? Or was it just an arbitrary object? I am this guy. The argument is valid. :-) Mex Attachments:
|
|
|
Post by mexicandruglord on Dec 13, 2011 6:18:14 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Art Vandelay on Dec 13, 2011 6:45:26 GMT -5
Well this should be amusing.
|
|
|
Post by Shane for Wax on Dec 13, 2011 7:31:26 GMT -5
So there's some guy on Youtube making a bunch of videos about how Richard Dawkins doesn't believe in the existence of raspberries. I was just wondering if there was any reason they chose raspberries... like did someone in that peer group say something about not knowing what they are? Or was it just an arbitrary object? I am this guy. The argument is valid. :-) Mex
|
|
|
Post by Mlle Antéchrist on Dec 13, 2011 8:33:51 GMT -5
I am this guy. The argument is valid. This is why your comparison is invalid.
|
|
|
Post by mechtaur on Dec 13, 2011 10:32:08 GMT -5
Well, that gave me a rage headache.
|
|
|
Post by Vene on Dec 13, 2011 11:11:36 GMT -5
I am this guy. The argument is valid. :-) Mex
|
|
|
Post by brendanrizzo on Dec 13, 2011 11:39:48 GMT -5
So then, Mexican Drug Lord, can you tell us why you are incapable of telling the difference between apes and monkeys?
|
|
|
Post by Bezron on Dec 13, 2011 14:23:31 GMT -5
So there's some guy on Youtube making a bunch of videos about how Richard Dawkins doesn't believe in the existence of raspberries. I was just wondering if there was any reason they chose raspberries... like did someone in that peer group say something about not knowing what they are? Or was it just an arbitrary object? I am this guy. The argument is valid. :-) Mex Just stating that your argument is valid, doesn't make it so. Please provide a comprehensive list of reasons why your argument is valid. Thanks
|
|
|
Post by Admiral Lithp on Dec 13, 2011 14:52:06 GMT -5
You're boring. Learn how to quote.
|
|
|
Post by SimSim on Dec 13, 2011 15:16:16 GMT -5
I'm less than ten seconds into this, and already nerd-raging over the monkey/ape mix-up. Glad I'm not the only one who nerdrages over that. You ever notice how when you correct people, and tell them how to tell the difference they give you a look that seems to say, "why does this even matter?"
|
|