|
|
Post by Admiral Lithp on Nov 11, 2011 18:50:33 GMT -5
I don't know the specifics, but I've heard that rape leaves evidence of trauma that consentual sex generally does not. That's with vaginal penetration, but if memory serves, the definition of rape still hinges on someone getting penetrated.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dragon Zachski on Nov 11, 2011 20:20:37 GMT -5
I'm also pretty sure I was talking about molestation.
|
|
|
|
Post by Admiral Lithp on Nov 11, 2011 20:50:46 GMT -5
Not really sure what that changes about my post.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dragon Zachski on Nov 11, 2011 21:01:43 GMT -5
Not really sure what that changes about my post. That depends. Was your post directed towards mine or was it directed to someone else's? |
|
|
|
Post by Admiral Lithp on Nov 11, 2011 23:52:00 GMT -5
Someone said something about not knowing how evidence of female-on-female rape would work.
Actually, I don't know how evidence of ANY rape is found, beyond what I said earlier. DNA evidence only proves that intercourse occurred.
|
|
|
|
Post by erictheblue on Nov 12, 2011 12:11:53 GMT -5
I don't know the specifics, but I've heard that rape leaves evidence of trauma that consentual sex generally does not. I don't know the specifics, but this is the case. Rape leaves tears in the vaginal wall in places that consensual sex does not. Depends on the state. Florida defines "sexual battery" as "oral, anal, or vaginal penetration by, or union with, the sexual organ of another or the anal or vaginal penetration of another by any other object; however, sexual battery does not include an act done for a bona fide medical purpose." I've seen case law that said "union with" included a male rubbing his penis on the penis of another male. Virginia defines it as "sexual intercourse with a complaining witness, whether or not his or her spouse, or causes a complaining witness, whether or not his or her spouse, to engage in sexual intercourse with any other person and such act is accomplished (i) against the complaining witness's will, by force, threat or intimidation of or against the complaining witness or another person; or (ii) through the use of the complaining witness's mental incapacity or physical helplessness; or (iii) with a child under age 13 as the victim." Case law states penetration is required. |
|
|
|
Post by booley on Nov 13, 2011 23:20:52 GMT -5
[/url] [/quote] Because the best rehab is life in prison until you die from your cellmates.[/quote] my first problem is that some people it's fun to throw porn bombs at random computers filled with the vilest porn they can find. Also the FBI itself has been known to put out sites that load porn onto computers obstensibly to get pedophiles but there's a question as to if the people visiting realize it's supposedly child porn. The FBI logs the ISP anyway. news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-9899151-38.htmllink since I realize that last part sounds just crazy and awful enough that a reasonable person may doubt it's true. Anyway... even though the above is well documented, saying "I have no idea how that got there!" is both a cliche and a really weak defense. Even if it's true. The first part of creating justice is realize human justice is inherently flawed. |
|
|
|
Post by booley on Nov 13, 2011 23:24:24 GMT -5
I don't know the specifics, but I've heard that rape leaves evidence of trauma that consentual sex generally does not. That's with vaginal penetration, but if memory serves, the definition of rape still hinges on someone getting penetrated. I have heard that too and it sounded reasonable. Abrasions will occur on different parts of the vagina depending on if the women positioned herself to help the man enter her or not. However I heard this on CSI and being into the penis I don't claim to have special knowledge of the girly parts... so I accept it with a grain of salt. (the idea. Not the vagina) |
|
|
|
Post by Admiral Lithp on Nov 13, 2011 23:47:14 GMT -5
I heard it on "police shows." Why I never bother to remember these titles is beyond me.
|
|
