|
Post by lexikon on Nov 26, 2011 0:35:50 GMT -5
That still has nothing to do with what she posted in the post you quoted. Also she's against child marriage you blockhead. Ironbite-are you this dense....SKYFIRE IS THAT YOU!? I quoted the whole thing, and nowhere did I suggest L supported Child marriage. How much on pain are you?
|
|
|
Post by ironbite on Nov 26, 2011 0:37:47 GMT -5
Generally when you make points with numbers, it's generally assumed you're responding to those numbered points. Hence the fact that you're so stupid you can't realize that.
Ironbite-and my headache isn't that bad but god damn you're testing my patience.
|
|
|
Post by lexikon on Nov 26, 2011 0:42:02 GMT -5
No I realized that. I just figure out people would be smart enough to notice the difference and get what I'm responding to without actually having to ask. But, just to make sure nobody else gets confused... Hardly. A legal contract—which is all marriage is (or should be, anyway) as far as the government is concerned—between two people will likely play out differently than a similar contract between three or more people. That doesn't mean we shouldn't at least try. Surely it's possible to set something up while still preventing the whole child-bride situation? Ban Child marriage, regardless of parental consent. Pretty much. It'll create more drama, and more people are needed to try to fix things. 1. I don't see it necessarily creating any more drama than a bad two-person marriage. My own parents' marriage was pretty much drama-free, so it's certainly possible for a poly marriage to be as well. 2. There are polyamorous people on these very boards who currently live together and share finances and seem to not deal with any more drama than any couple. Considering that most marital issues are a side-effect of living together and sharing finances, I don't see that allowing such groups--who, again, already live under one roof anyway--to make their commitment "official" via group marriage in any way creates new drama. 3. More people needed to fix things? Well, it's a good thing there are already more people around to begin with, then. After all, if conflict arises between Spouse A and Spouse B, Spouse C could be able to calm them down and get them to talk things over like rational human beings.[/quote] 1. False analogy; we're not looking at good relationships. A better example would be my parents' marriage which was hectic. I'm glad they're seperated, and I think a 3rd spouse might have caused more problems that. 2. Other factors would need to be taken into consideration, like # of people, relationships before marriage, etc. 3. More counselor, lawyers, ect. And Rat's new plan won't work, but it's more specific than what he proposed ;D
|
|
|
Post by ironbite on Nov 26, 2011 0:49:20 GMT -5
Hey look, that actually makes so much more sense and you don't come off as such a massive jerk-off.
Ironbite-you're still a jack-ass but not as much of one.
|
|
|
Post by The_L on Nov 26, 2011 9:14:13 GMT -5
..................................................ok. Let me try again. I have a headache so I may be missing something. L said Then you said Now I might be in a fuck ton on pain but...there's nothing in her post to even think she supports Child Marriage. Like...at all. Ironbite-so please, point this out to me. I need a laugh. His 1 corresponds with my response to you, which is above my 1. My 1 corresponds to his 2.
|
|
|
Post by ironbite on Nov 26, 2011 10:48:06 GMT -5
yeah I got that. it was the weird formating that through me for a loop tis all.
|
|