|
|
Post by gyeonghwa on Nov 21, 2011 21:25:17 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Thejebusfire on Nov 21, 2011 22:54:00 GMT -5
But that's just the liberal media bias.
|
|
|
|
Post by itachirumon on Nov 22, 2011 0:05:01 GMT -5
MATH IS HARRRRRD LAUREN, OKAAAAYYYY?
|
|
|
|
Post by sylvana on Nov 22, 2011 4:31:56 GMT -5
Didn't fox news actually get around delivering valid news by claiming they are actually an entertainment station or something? Although being less informed than people who don't look up news, is a special kind of low.
|
|
|
|
Post by N. De Plume on Nov 22, 2011 8:45:30 GMT -5
Didn't fox news actually get around delivering valid news by claiming they are actually an entertainment station or something? That’s what I heard. Of course, this claim is only available on the official government-type documents that their audience never sees. That way they can portray themselves as a bona fide news organization to said audience. |
|
|
|
Post by brendanrizzo on Nov 22, 2011 12:05:29 GMT -5
Fox News? Entertainment? That's... suspiciously appropriate.
|
|
|
|
Post by dasfuchs on Nov 22, 2011 13:26:40 GMT -5
Didn't fox news actually get around delivering valid news by claiming they are actually an entertainment station or something? That’s what I heard. Of course, this claim is only available on the official government-type documents that their audience never sees. That way they can portray themselves as a bona fide news organization to said audience. Even if it were put up in broadway lights it's too late, they already have their rabid followers that defend Fox more than they defend Bush |
|
|
|
Post by shykid on Nov 22, 2011 13:31:14 GMT -5
Didn't fox news actually get around delivering valid news by claiming they are actually an entertainment station or something? Although being less informed than people who don't look up news, is a special kind of low. That was actually a FOX (as in the broadcast network) affiliate not directly connected to FOX News, though FOX News is certainly living up to the spirit of this judgment. NPR and PBS are constantly being attacked by the far right for being "liberal," yet these kinds of studies consistently rank NPR and PBS news audiences as the most informed groups. They're almost unwittingly admitting reality itself has what they perceive as a "liberal bias." |
|
|
|
Post by Admiral Lithp on Nov 22, 2011 14:20:26 GMT -5
Sure it does, just ask Colbert.
|
|
|
|
Post by shykid on Nov 22, 2011 16:21:11 GMT -5
fuck reality and it's fuckin' radical librul agenda
|
|
|
|
Post by N. De Plume on Nov 22, 2011 16:29:01 GMT -5
That’s what I heard. Of course, this claim is only available on the official government-type documents that their audience never sees. That way they can portray themselves as a bona fide news organization to said audience. Even if it were put up in broadway lights it's too late, they already have their rabid followers that defend Fox more than they defend Bush Indeed. But I would hazard a guess that the attention would make it a tad more difficult to pick up newer true believers, unless maybe they tried to pull it off like their own version of The Daily Show. |
|
|
|
Post by lexikon on Nov 22, 2011 16:50:21 GMT -5
I something similar a while ago. MSNBC and Public broadcasting do much better, although they have some weak points.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dragon Zachski on Nov 22, 2011 16:58:42 GMT -5
I something similar a while ago. Have you ever been so far even as decided to use go want to look more like? |
|
|
|
Post by Admiral Lithp on Nov 22, 2011 17:05:24 GMT -5
I accidently this thread.
|
|
|
|
Post by brendanrizzo on Nov 23, 2011 10:36:25 GMT -5
Let's be fair to lexikon here. I sometimes forget to type certain words. Thing is, I reread my posts, and then go back and fix them in editing.
|
|
