Man kills priest for being a molester

[Her3tiK]

newyork.cbslocal.com/2011/11/28/man-on-trial-for-killing-n-j-priest-says-clergymans-abuse-forced-his-hand/

The stabbing occurred inside the church. Feliciano, the long-time custodian, claims that at the age of 59 the priest began allegedly molesting him and it went on for five years.

“When he picked it up, I took it away from him and I sliced him in the hand I believe, just slice I said, ‘You see this father?’ And he said ‘what are you going to do about it? You are not going to hurt me.’”


The priest managed to call 911 as he was being stabbed.

The prosecution says Feliciano killed the priest when Father Hinds found out Feliciano had a past that included molesting a 7-year-old and fired him. Feliciano said he snapped because the priest had taken advantage of him.

I don't care how sadistic it sounds, I'm glad someone finally made one of these fuckers (no pun intended) pay for what they've done. If the RCC won't do it, and law enforcement won't step in, what other choice is there?

[clockworkgirl21]

And nothing of value was lost.

[priestling]

No tears shed here.

[itachirumon]

So wait, they're both molesters and one just snapped because the other happened to molest him as well? Or is the prosecution lying for Jesus? Wow, okay there, things just got interesting.

[Smurfette Principle]

Looks like both were molesters and the man was schizophrenic or something similar to boot.

I'm not going to rejoice in the guy's death - I save that for Fred Phelps and his ilk.

[itachirumon]

Same, I'm keeping my response to grim surprise... But add Bryan Fischer into that. He's reached Phelps-ian levels of disgusting. When the two of them die I'm getting a white tux and dancing on their graves.

[Runa]

Zero! Zero fucks given about the death of a pedophile.

[Caitshidhe]

Yeah, even though the guy is himself an alleged molester... I'm willing to take that with a grain of salt until further information is gleaned. Whereas I am willing to believe simply on suggestion that a priest is guilty of such a thing until proven innocent. Is that fair? No. Is it justified? Hell yes.

I do not give a single solitary fuck about the sick bastards that molest children OR the organization that bends over backwards and expends HUGE amounts of money (which could probably do a lot better donated to the poor--you know, like that weirdo Jesus said we should do?) to protect them. I've said it before and I'll say it again: that pedophiles exist in the ranks of the RCC does not enrage me. What enrages me is that the church KNEW ABOUT IT and covered it up. If the church had come out and said straight away, "Aw, HELL NAW!" and done the right thing to begin with, I'm sure their public perception would not be down the shitter like it currently is.

If you prey on the innocent--children, mentally disabled people, crippled people, little old ladies--then you are a monster and you deserve to die painfully. I don't care how much of a monster that makes me. I will never spare a single MOLECULE of sympathy for these people. They have gotten BETTER than what they deserve.

[gyeonghwa]

The only tear I shed is for the victims and the trouble it all caused.

Nov 28, 2011 23:55:17 GMT -5 itachirumon said:

Same, I'm keeping my response to grim surprise... But add Bryan Fischer into that. He's reached Phelps-ian levels of disgusting. When the two of them die I'm getting a white tux and dancing on their graves.

God I hate Bryan Fischer. But to be consistent, I wouldn't waste money or time celebrating death of that scum. A Budlight for all the lives he ruined.

[Paradox]

Even child molesters are human beings. There's no reason to celebrate a violent crime like this.

[gyeonghwa]

Nov 29, 2011 0:42:46 GMT -5 Paradox said:

Even child molesters are human beings. There's no reason to celebrate a violent crime like this.

That is true. But to be fair, I don't think most people thought it as celebrating.

[Paradox]

Nov 29, 2011 0:50:43 GMT -5 gyeonghwa said:

Nov 29, 2011 0:42:46 GMT -5 Paradox said:

Even child molesters are human beings. There's no reason to celebrate a violent crime like this.

That is true. But to be fair, I don't think most people thought it as celebrating.

Fair point.

[ragabash]

Okay, I think some people here aren't reading the text. The person killed here isn't the alleged child molester, the alleged child molester is the person who killed the priest, accusing said priest had been sexually assaulting him at the age of 59.
If a 59 year old is a child, then I think most of the people posting in this thread would be child molesters by that standard.

Again, to summarize, priest is murdered, approximately 64 year old suspect claims to have been molested for past five years. Assaulting a 59 year old =/= child molestation.

[Admiral Lithp]

Nov 29, 2011 0:42:46 GMT -5 Paradox said:

Even child molesters are human beings. There's no reason to celebrate a violent crime like this.

All else aside, I don't recall being obligated to desire a person's continued well-being just because they happen to be homo sapien. Call it the Hitler Exemption.

[Art Vandelay]

According to the article, I'm not quite certain that Hinds was a molester. Feliciano himself claims that he did it because Hinds molested him whereas the prosecution claims that he did it because Hinds found out that he molested a 7 year old, among other things. Personally, I'm more inclined to believe that Hinds wasn't a molester, which of course means an innocent fellow was stabbed to death by a paedophile trying to cover his tracks.