|
|
Post by Shane for Wax on Nov 30, 2011 1:53:58 GMT -5
I stopped reading after that. Reads JUST like a New World Order conspiracy with feminist and marriage changed to 'zionists' and 'gold'.
|
|
|
|
Post by DarkfireTaimatsu on Nov 30, 2011 2:43:55 GMT -5
Is "interesting" just an anagram, or is it me? >w> |
|
|
|
Post by Shane for Wax on Nov 30, 2011 2:46:10 GMT -5
Is "interesting" just an anagram, or is it me? >w> I guess they got lazy about that word. |
|
|
|
Post by Hyperio on Nov 30, 2011 5:37:45 GMT -5
What a great sample of projection. Does he not understand that feminist is not the same as same sex female? Or just he pretends not to? Why does he suggest that all women will become lesbian/bisexual if they are allowed to? I see that "women having rights" and "welfare state" has become boogeymen for those people.  |
|
|
|
Post by Shane for Wax on Nov 30, 2011 5:44:43 GMT -5
I also like how he says that gay marriage is basically polygamy.
What about Christian marriages? With God, jesus, and the holy ghost or whatever?
|
|
Kali
Junior Member
Posts: 68
|
Post by Kali on Nov 30, 2011 6:13:18 GMT -5
Because marriage is never about attraction, or caring for someone. It's only ever for money. Same reason people have children: they want more money. Totally makes sense.
Oh, wait, today isn't backwards day? Nevermind.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mlle Antéchrist on Nov 30, 2011 8:28:10 GMT -5
Every time I try to read this, all I see is, "I'm off my Thorazine again."
|
|
|
|
Post by brendanrizzo on Nov 30, 2011 9:41:33 GMT -5
What a great sample of projection. Does he not understand that feminist is not the same as same sex female? Or just he pretends not to? Why does he suggest that all women will become lesbian/bisexual if they are allowed to? I see that "women having rights" and "welfare state" has become boogeymen for those people. I remember reading somewhere once that the original reason for homosexuality being illegal was that people were terrified that gay sex was so enjoyable that, if it were allowed, no one would ever engage in heterosexual intercourse, so the birth rate would drop to zero and humanity would die out. Of course, the fact that this is what they thought says something about the sexualities of the people who promoted this idea... |
|
|
|
Post by Dragon Zachski on Nov 30, 2011 15:42:04 GMT -5
What a great sample of projection. Does he not understand that feminist is not the same as same sex female? Or just he pretends not to? Why does he suggest that all women will become lesbian/bisexual if they are allowed to? I see that "women having rights" and "welfare state" has become boogeymen for those people. I remember reading somewhere once that the original reason for homosexuality being illegal was that people were terrified that gay sex was so enjoyable that, if it were allowed, no one would ever engage in heterosexual intercourse, so the birth rate would drop to zero and humanity would die out. Of course, the fact that this is what they thought says something about the sexualities of the people who promoted this idea... And bingo. ;D |
|
|
|
Post by Old Viking on Nov 30, 2011 16:19:19 GMT -5
Wait till you see the proposal for feminist traffic laws.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mlle Antéchrist on Nov 30, 2011 16:21:09 GMT -5
^^ Maybe they'll have "no means no" seminars for people who cut through red lights.
|
|
|
|
Post by ltfred on Nov 30, 2011 17:49:19 GMT -5
What a great sample of projection. Does he not understand that feminist is not the same as same sex female? Or just he pretends not to? Why does he suggest that all women will become lesbian/bisexual if they are allowed to? I see that "women having rights" and "welfare state" has become boogeymen for those people. I remember reading somewhere once that the original reason for homosexuality being illegal was that people were terrified that gay sex was so enjoyable that, if it were allowed, no one would ever engage in heterosexual intercourse, so the birth rate would drop to zero and humanity would die out. Of course, the fact that this is what they thought says something about the sexualities of the people who promoted this idea... I thought it was because the Victorians (including the Queen herself) were delicate little pettles who couldn't bear the idea of anyone violating their version of political correctness. |
|
|
|
Post by lighthorseman on Nov 30, 2011 18:38:52 GMT -5
ltfred, homosexuality was condemned long before Vicki came on the scene.
|
|
|
|
Post by ltfred on Nov 30, 2011 18:51:19 GMT -5
Were there codified laws against it?
|
|
|
|
Post by lighthorseman on Nov 30, 2011 19:03:56 GMT -5
|
|
