Post by Nutcase on Jun 3, 2009 17:13:32 GMT -5
Some of you may remember Zsuzsanna Anderson, wife of the pissing pastor who got tazed at a border patrol station for failing to cooperate with authorities.
This lady hates homosexuals, people with AIDS, and poor folks – I assume in that order. She also hates women, and figures if she rags on them enough, her church will make her an honorary man and thus worthy of being treated with a modicum of respect denied those women who fail to "act properly."
She has a new post up at her blog about an undercover “exposé” of several Planned Parenthood clinics that were willing to help teenagers get abortions without parental permission. When a few posters pointed out the poor timing of her melodramatic bullshit, she posted this:
You didn’t bother waiting ‘til the body was cold before posting, however, and so your timing is still suspect.
Two things:
1) If aborted babies automatically go to heaven, then you should be all for abortion. Abortions for everyone. Yay abortion.
2) If you were really against vigilantism – or, as we in the reality-based community call it, homicide – then you wouldn’t have followed your tepid disclaimer with a ‘BUT.’
Murder. Not ‘execution,’ a term which implies some legitimacy for the act: Murder. And what you fail to understand, perhaps willfully, is that neither he nor anyone who supported his work considered abortion tantamount to murder. Everyone agrees that killing a fully formed, living, breathing human being is murder - everyone, that is, except you and your ilk.
Maybe it’s because you live in opposite land, where the potential lives of fetuses are more important than the actual lives of women, that you think 'a woman's health' is insufficient reason for abortion.
One of your posters certainly feels that way. (We’ll get to her cruel stupidity in a moment.)
You know what they say about the anti-abortion movement: They care about life from conception to birth. After that, people can either fend for themselves or drop dead.
There you go again, confusing actual people with potential people. This is getting to be a real habit with you.
…or not “children” at all, but clumps of cells that can grow into children, or into tumors, depending on how the pregnancy progresses.
'Twisting the facts for Jesus' is still lying, bitch.
Yeah, you are advocating acts of violence. You’re just too much of a coward to come right out and own it.
Not only are you a coward, but deluded: “OMG. I’m so brave. People will surely hate me for this stupid post I wrote, thus proving what a great martyr I am for the cause of the unborn. As for the born, however, both hubby and I agree: Let them eat cake.”
I can quote the Bible, too. Watch this:
Proverbs 24:17-18 -- Rejoice not when thine enemy falleth, and let not thine heart be glad when he stumbleth: Lest the Lord see it, and it displease Him, and He turn away His wrath from him.
Zsuzanna tends to bring out even worse in her defenders than in her detractors. As proof, I offer this comment by “Jenny”:
Yeah – married women with other children should have “thought of it” before they got pregnant again and ended up with an ectopic pregnancy, a molar pregnancy, or a dead fetus in utero. Yes, they should have thought about that before they “played.” Now those evil bitches can drop dead and leave us good Christians alone.
Most women don’t have your awesome psychic powers.
Try your glib nonsense on women who’ve borne babies with anencephaly. See how that cheap moralizing goes over with them. Or try it on women whose babies are born with DS, but the women have no medical insurance and the babies can't be covered for the heart surgeries most of them will need, because they have "pre-existing conditions." (Maybe you can also explain to those women why most of you fundies are conservitards who opposed universal healthcare.)
This lady hates homosexuals, people with AIDS, and poor folks – I assume in that order. She also hates women, and figures if she rags on them enough, her church will make her an honorary man and thus worthy of being treated with a modicum of respect denied those women who fail to "act properly."
She has a new post up at her blog about an undercover “exposé” of several Planned Parenthood clinics that were willing to help teenagers get abortions without parental permission. When a few posters pointed out the poor timing of her melodramatic bullshit, she posted this:
This post was not inspired by recent news about the shooting of George Tiller. I had actually started writing it last week, but had not yet had time to embed the video clips and therefore did not publish it until today.
You didn’t bother waiting ‘til the body was cold before posting, however, and so your timing is still suspect.
I certainly do not condone vigilantism and taking it upon ourselves to execute judgment. But am I glad that Tiller is dead - absolutely! At least he will not be killing any more babies. I am glad Tiller is dead and in hell, while the children he murdered will spend eternity with Christ. I am sure by now he is not in favor of abortions any more.
Two things:
1) If aborted babies automatically go to heaven, then you should be all for abortion. Abortions for everyone. Yay abortion.
2) If you were really against vigilantism – or, as we in the reality-based community call it, homicide – then you wouldn’t have followed your tepid disclaimer with a ‘BUT.’
I very much agree with the above comment left by Dismas, particularly regarding the pro-life camp. Is there actually a born-again Christian out there who in their heart of hearts is truly grieved by the death of this monster? To compare the murder of tens of thousands of innocent babies to the execution of this sick, perverted man is insanity.
Murder. Not ‘execution,’ a term which implies some legitimacy for the act: Murder. And what you fail to understand, perhaps willfully, is that neither he nor anyone who supported his work considered abortion tantamount to murder. Everyone agrees that killing a fully formed, living, breathing human being is murder - everyone, that is, except you and your ilk.
Maybe it’s because you live in opposite land, where the potential lives of fetuses are more important than the actual lives of women, that you think 'a woman's health' is insufficient reason for abortion.
One of your posters certainly feels that way. (We’ll get to her cruel stupidity in a moment.)
You know what they say about the anti-abortion movement: They care about life from conception to birth. After that, people can either fend for themselves or drop dead.
Let's say you are shopping at the mall, when suddenly you observe a man pulling out a gun and opening fire on random children playing at the play area. He keeps gunning them down, one after the other, and they try in vain to get away or find mercy. Let's say a security guard runs up and shoots the murderer in the head, finally stopping him. Would pro-lifers call the security guard a murderer? Would they say that it was wrong to kill the shooter? What about soldiers who kill the enemy in combat - is that murder?
There you go again, confusing actual people with potential people. This is getting to be a real habit with you.
All taking of human life is not murder. Yes, I agree that it is not our job to execute judgment. Abortion doctors and nurses should be tried for murder and speedily executed by our justice system. It is sad that today in our country, babies can be murdered in their mothers' wombs, which should be the safest place on the face of the earth for them. Their murder is only legal because the children are small, and "invisible".
…or not “children” at all, but clumps of cells that can grow into children, or into tumors, depending on how the pregnancy progresses.
Evil societies have always tried to kill off the young and the elderly, as well as other "fringe" populations. There is a bill being introduced in Texas right now, aptly dubbed the "Infanticide Bill", that would make the killing of a child under one year of age not murder, punishable by 180 days to max 2 years in prison, and/or a max. fine of $10,000. Such heinous acts will bring the judgment of God on our nation.
'Twisting the facts for Jesus' is still lying, bitch.
Again, I am not advocating acts of violence. If Tiller had died in a car accident or any other way, I would be just as glad. Many times in the Bible, God used wicked, heathen people to execute judgment on his own people. That doesn't automatically make those nations and their acts righteous.
Yeah, you are advocating acts of violence. You’re just too much of a coward to come right out and own it.
No doubt, this comment of mine will draw much criticism and hate from those who are (often willingly) ignorant of God's Word.
Not only are you a coward, but deluded: “OMG. I’m so brave. People will surely hate me for this stupid post I wrote, thus proving what a great martyr I am for the cause of the unborn. As for the born, however, both hubby and I agree: Let them eat cake.”
Psalm 58:10 The righteous shall rejoice when he seeth the vengeance: he shall wash his feet in the blood of the wicked.
Genesis 9:6 Whoso sheddeth man's blood, by man shall his blood be shed: for in the image of God made he man.
Galatians 6:7 Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap.
I can quote the Bible, too. Watch this:
Proverbs 24:17-18 -- Rejoice not when thine enemy falleth, and let not thine heart be glad when he stumbleth: Lest the Lord see it, and it displease Him, and He turn away His wrath from him.
Zsuzanna tends to bring out even worse in her defenders than in her detractors. As proof, I offer this comment by “Jenny”:
There is no reason ever, ever, to commit murder by aborting. EVER. So I'm glad you won't publish comments that condone it. Anyone that gets pregnant has other options besides murder. I've had close friends that gave their baby up for adoption. Abortion is a selfish act, all the way around. It is incredibly sad.I'm sure some people want to tout health issues as to why they abort. That could have been thought of before they played.
I'm sure some people want to tout health issues as to why they abort. That could have been thought of before they played.Yeah – married women with other children should have “thought of it” before they got pregnant again and ended up with an ectopic pregnancy, a molar pregnancy, or a dead fetus in utero. Yes, they should have thought about that before they “played.” Now those evil bitches can drop dead and leave us good Christians alone.
If I knew that having a baby would be detrimental to my health, wouldn't I have made sure I avoided everything possible to prevent geting pregnant?
Most women don’t have your awesome psychic powers.
If I found out I was pregnant with a down syndrome baby, he is still the creation of God and I will love him/her no matter what. There never is a valid reason for abortion. I read about a family also where the wife was raped and became pregnant. She knew it wasn't the baby's fault so she gave birth to the baby, and is now being raised in the same home, loved by everyone.
Try your glib nonsense on women who’ve borne babies with anencephaly. See how that cheap moralizing goes over with them. Or try it on women whose babies are born with DS, but the women have no medical insurance and the babies can't be covered for the heart surgeries most of them will need, because they have "pre-existing conditions." (Maybe you can also explain to those women why most of you fundies are conservitards who opposed universal healthcare.)
