|
Post by wmdkitty on Nov 11, 2009 2:57:10 GMT -5
We haven't had an orgy. We'd need at least two more spice to have an orgy. See, I always say that three is a threesome, and four is an orgy, but others say that four is a foursome and five is an orgy. How do we decide! But three is definitely not an orgy, despite what my roommate has to say about my birthday party. Under WA state law, if more than three people remove the same article of clothing and are touching, it's an orgy. Meaning, we could have four people all remove their shoes and hold hands: ORGY!
|
|
|
Post by Vene on Nov 11, 2009 2:59:09 GMT -5
I'm more concerned that Mr. Omnipotent couldn't even best a mortal man wrestling. (link)
|
|
|
Post by DarkfireTaimatsu on Nov 11, 2009 4:07:09 GMT -5
I'm more concerned that Mr. Omnipotent couldn't even best a mortal man wrestling. (link)Wrestling's fixed anyways. =3
|
|
|
Post by ironbite on Nov 11, 2009 7:26:38 GMT -5
IT'S STILL REAL TO ME damnmit!
|
|
|
Post by nautical999 on Nov 11, 2009 8:53:12 GMT -5
Vene
actually there was a good discussion on this subject on our site. I explained it like this. My children and i wrestle and for them they try as hard as they can and when they "pin" daddy they actually believe it. It is a bonding and a loving thing for me to wrestle with them i do not need to win to have fun and feel closer to them.
|
|
|
Post by yojetak on Nov 11, 2009 8:55:20 GMT -5
i just watched this video. Maybe it will help your confusion, nautical. Also, do watch to the end to see the effects of your discrimination has on intersex people. The world isn't binary when it comes to sexual identity and preference.
|
|
|
Post by Bluefinger on Nov 11, 2009 9:21:46 GMT -5
Blufinger As always my answers will come from the bible on this.. God made adam and eve, Not adam and Steve, or edna and eve. His original plan was for them to remain in the garden as His companion I would guess until they had sinned and eaten of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. Even though they were able to eat of the tree of life they didn't. After that they were expelled from the garden where the womans curse was child birth and menstrations. The were told to be fruitful and multiply. They had many children and so forth and then satan tempted men and women to do the opposite as to what they were designed to do. I suppose they all moved to soddom and gomorra for there immoral comradery and then were detroyed. Homosexuality is an abomination unto God and he hates it. He does not hate the sinner in the sin but hates the sin. Like i said before i myself have been down this road because of being molested. It left me confused. However God took that from me just like he can take it from those here. The sins that cause homosexuality are as follows rape molest incest Rejection from parents no fatherly figure to look to mother running the house while father sit backs and does nothing or is passive generational curses of the same sins Also the sins of the person who is gay, A sexual act with someone allowing yourself to fantasize about the same sex acting upon fantasy I'm sure here are more but those are the ones that come to mind Buh? Lolwut? Nautical, all this hasn't explained WHY god hates homosexuality and finds it to be abominable. All you've done here is said "Here's a bunch of stuff that causes X and because all that causes X, then X is bad". However, most of that is utter crap. However, the question still remains, what is it about homosexuality itself that makes it sinful? You've said it is because it is caused by other sins and causes sin. But that says nothing on homosexuality itself. What is it about two guys or two girls being together that is supposedly wrong? Having sex is considered sinful outside of marriage, ergo better to have it inside marriage right? So, why not allow gay people to marry? That way, it is less sinful, right? Oh right, but that would mean giving up silly prejudices... Also, what is bad about sexual fantasy? Why can't someone have sexual fantasies of any sort? Is it wrong to fantasise about screwing women with red hair? Or to be screwed by a women with red hair (a la pegging)? What is it about sexual fantasy that is wrong? And if the person acting out the fantasy does it with a consenting adult, why should it matter at all? Or must all sex be done missionary style, and for the sole purpose of pushing out babies? Also, on this issue of transgender, like I said before, I've said I feel I don't look androgynous enough. I myself am finding that I'm increasingly perceiving myself as not really a specific 'male', nor wanting to perceive myself as a specific 'female'. I am finding that I do have both feminine and masculine traits, but these are generally part of what makes me 'me'. Whilst my body is strictly 'male', mind-wise, I don't feel at all masculine. I just feel 'myself', which is technically genderless. My experiences and memories have no doubt influenced the me I've become, but nonetheless, there are aspects of me that continue to express themselves regardless. In this sense, I'm finding it more and more reasonable to just say that I'm psychologically androgynous. As for what body I'd would rather have, I'd prefer a cybernetic prosthetic body, or several of which I can swap between depending on my mood. Flesh is for the weak, anyway. Though on the choice of a single 'main' body, I'd go for physically androgynous model. As for genitalia, I'm happy enough with having a penis, but this should be attached to an androgynous body (generally slim and slightly shapely) with small boobs. Long hair is a must. So yeah, my fleshy body is irrelevant to my needs, and is only a vessel for my mind. If I can swap this fleshy thing for something better, I would so do it.
|
|
|
Post by Bezron on Nov 11, 2009 10:15:00 GMT -5
magnazeal If you were to choose for the rest of your life which one would it be i just saw that you're from illinois. i apologize for my state. Don't bother, Yoji, he's from the southern part. You know, Kentucnois.
|
|
|
Post by Bezron on Nov 11, 2009 10:22:36 GMT -5
Hi, Nautical?
By my count it has been 2-3 days since I last posted specific things to you. Since that time, the thread has grown by nearly 10 pages, with you having been online on most of those days. I had actually noted at one point that I had posted the previous day and not been addressed. I can only conclude that you are pointedly ignoring any and all items which I have posted to you. This is, of course, against the forum rules and you have been warned by the mods for it in the past. I, also, have been more than fair in awaiting your reply. You leave me no alternative but to request that you be disciplined. Whether or not my request is honored, and the form of any discipline is, of course up to the mod team, but I would like my complaint publicly noted here.
|
|
|
Post by John E on Nov 11, 2009 10:46:09 GMT -5
davedan Yes if it is Gods will for him to see His power in this way and to prove to him that he does exist then yes he would intervene. But of course John would say it was just coincidence I know I said I was off for the night but... So if I flip the coins, even without praying, they'll land heads up to prove to me that Jesus is god? If this is what you're saying, I'll do it, video tape it so you can see, and if heads land up more often, by a statistically significant amount (any statisticians in the house want to tell me how much that would actually be?) I promise to rethink my stance on Christianity, stop bugging you for proof, and publicly state on this board that you are a true healer of God. Provided one thing... You promise that if the test fails (tails land up more or they come up the same within a statistical margin of error), you will rethink your beliefs, stop making supernatural claims without evidence, and publicly state on this board that you are a false prophet and god is a superstition. Do we have a deal? Well? Do we have a deal?
|
|
|
Post by Rat Of Steel on Nov 11, 2009 11:40:02 GMT -5
You have no idea what is in my life, nor will you ever, because I'm not about to discuss personal issues with the likes of you. So do your little bad-grammar trolling on other subjects or, God help me, I will ban-hammer your ass so fast you'll get a nosebleed. Yeah, I know that would be an abuse of my mod powers, but I doubt any of the other mods would blame me one bit. Nor would the vast majority of ordinary users, I'm guessing. *whistles innocently while deliberately not looking in Sandman's direction, secretly listening for the sound of hammer against skull*
|
|
|
Post by Bluefinger on Nov 11, 2009 12:25:02 GMT -5
Hi, Nautical? By my count it has been 2-3 days since I last posted specific things to you. Since that time, the thread has grown by nearly 10 pages, with you having been online on most of those days. I had actually noted at one point that I had posted the previous day and not been addressed. I can only conclude that you are pointedly ignoring any and all items which I have posted to you. This is, of course, against the forum rules and you have been warned by the mods for it in the past. I, also, have been more than fair in awaiting your reply. You leave me no alternative but to request that you be disciplined. Whether or not my request is honored, and the form of any discipline is, of course up to the mod team, but I would like my complaint publicly noted here. *mod-hat on*
Since a complaint has been made and that there's been an official warning issued before, I am going to honour the request for action.
Sorry guys, but Nautical is banned from here on out. For what it is worth, he would have either side-stepped or given non-answers anyway. There's enough on here to incriminate him for mod action anyway.
Also, thread locked due to main involved guest and star of thread no longer participating.
*mod-hat off*
|
|