|
Post by mistermuncher on Mar 23, 2009 14:11:22 GMT -5
Poor old Kenneth, eh? Sharp as a bowling ball and fading by the second. Imagine his shock and disgust when those godless, evil, euro-liberal types at the BBC tried to "ambush" him with a debate when he wasn't expecting it. i mean, it's not Ham goes around trying to get into debates with "evolutionist defenders" or anything. Anyway, the whole incident is a disgrace. I mean, what sort of dishonest prick would get someone cued up for an interview, and then spring it on them that it was, in fact a debate. Ken Ham. A fucking snake by any measure you care to name* * DNA Testing excluded. Not a guarantee
|
|
|
Post by devilschaplain2 on Mar 23, 2009 14:17:12 GMT -5
I've got nothing; this is exactly the way I'd expect Ken Ham to behave.
|
|
|
Post by mistermuncher on Mar 23, 2009 14:25:09 GMT -5
Thats true. I realise it's possibly redundant, too. I just was rather aggrieved that he was slinging mud at the Beeb, who, for all their faults, still are a reasonably credible news and natural science outlet, for indulging in behaviour he found perfectly alright when he was doing it.
|
|
|
Post by devilschaplain2 on Mar 23, 2009 14:41:09 GMT -5
Though I've always wondered how a fully-grown man who looks exactly like an ape could oppose evolution ^_^
|
|
|
Post by wackadoodle on Mar 23, 2009 15:19:31 GMT -5
5 bucks says this person would turn around and claim athiests are immoral and do anything they want cause they dont have any god to tell them not to.
|
|
|
Post by mistermuncher on Mar 23, 2009 15:45:21 GMT -5
The five bucks is, in fact, yours already...
"By the way—the BBC has not responded to our publicist who has challenged them concerning their deception. Then again, for those people who don’t believe in God and there is no absolute authority, not telling the truth and deception would not be ethically wrong—as they have no basis for right and wrong!"
Cheers, Kenny, ye fuckin ganch.
|
|
|
Post by wackadoodle on Mar 23, 2009 15:56:25 GMT -5
The tiny percentage of christians who actually follow every rule laid out in the bible might have a point with that argument. The 90% of christians who just do whatever the fuck they want and say god's on their side whenever they're called out on it have no business talking about 'objective morality' or 'absolute authority' when both of those just mean 'I'm right, discussion over'
|
|
|
Post by headache on Mar 23, 2009 17:25:04 GMT -5
Poor old Kenneth, eh? Sharp as a bowling ball and fading by the second. Imagine his shock and disgust when those godless, evil, euro-liberal types at the BBC tried to "ambush" him with a debate when he wasn't expecting it. i mean, it's not Ham goes around trying to get into debates with "evolutionist defenders" or anything. Anyway, the whole incident is a disgrace. I mean, what sort of dishonest prick would get someone cued up for an interview, and then spring it on them that it was, in fact a debate. Ken Ham. A fucking snake by any measure you care to name* * DNA Testing excluded. Not a guaranteeI've got only one thing to say: Kenny, not my man, you got:
|
|
|
Post by Green-Eyed Lilo on Mar 23, 2009 18:28:32 GMT -5
Though I've always wondered how a fully-grown man who looks exactly like an ape could oppose evolution ^_^ For his next job, he can work with Geico to bring back the "Caveman" campaign. He'd save them a fortune on makeup.
|
|
|
Post by Armand Tanzarian on Mar 24, 2009 0:59:05 GMT -5
Though I've always wondered how a fully-grown man who looks exactly like an ape could oppose evolution ^_^ For his next job, he can work with Geico to bring back the "Caveman" campaign. He'd save them a fortune on makeup. Calling Ken Ham a caveman is a serious insult to cavemen. Here's a fact: The fact that he handles himself almost the same way between the BBC and Bill Maher shows you how pathetic he is.
|
|
|
Post by ostravan on Mar 24, 2009 2:27:46 GMT -5
The BBC is the icon of objectivity and impartiality. They are masters of the art of making the stupid and corrupt appear exactly as they truly are, out of their own mouths. Being an ex-fundie myself, Ken Ham is naught but a deluded fraud whose followers have little education.
|
|
|
Post by pdc1987 on Mar 24, 2009 16:46:47 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Hades on Mar 24, 2009 21:12:08 GMT -5
Though I've always wondered how a fully-grown man who looks exactly like an ape could oppose evolution ^_^ Lmao, yeah he does look like some sort of ape. If you can't wear a beard well... don't wear one at all.
|
|
|
Post by devilschaplain2 on Mar 24, 2009 21:14:18 GMT -5
Though I've always wondered how a fully-grown man who looks exactly like an ape could oppose evolution ^_^ Lmao, yeah he does look like some sort of ape. If you can't wear a beard well... don't wear one at all. Off-topic, but nice avatar--I fucking LOVE Mythbusters!
|
|
|
Post by Hades on Mar 24, 2009 21:43:58 GMT -5
Lmao, yeah he does look like some sort of ape. If you can't wear a beard well... don't wear one at all. Off-topic, but nice avatar--I fucking LOVE Mythbusters! Thanks ^_^ I made him as a t-shirt design.
|
|