|
Post by Distind on Mar 4, 2009 19:58:20 GMT -5
clockworkgirl21, please. I don't like this new system. I did vote a lot of stuff in, but that's because I have low standards of what's fundie. One of the rules was that it didn't have to be religious. The stuff I didn't understand I just skipped. Honestly, going just by approvals vs deletes your record is rather impressive. In a Gamefax way. But you've got a considerably better approval score(was approved that you voted to approve), so I'll give you the shot. Your approval score is actually slightly higher than my own, despite almost never using the delete button. Modify: Oh, and you're in.
|
|
|
Post by Lady Renae on Mar 4, 2009 20:19:10 GMT -5
Just as a method of reporting things that need to be fixed, would it be terribly bad for me to 'revive' my fledgling "non-poe non-repeat violations" thread, or should we just PM you when we see things get through that are wrong?
|
|
|
Post by Distind on Mar 4, 2009 20:24:06 GMT -5
Just as a method of reporting things that need to be fixed, would it be terribly bad for me to 'revive' my fledgling "non-poe non-repeat violations" thread, or should we just PM you when we see things get through that are wrong? Go for it, I was hoping the comments being available would help to stomp it out, but they could still get through.
|
|
|
Post by Lady Renae on Mar 4, 2009 20:29:11 GMT -5
Ok then. Give me a bit to build up a suitable example portfolio for people who may have questions, and I'll set it up again.
|
|
|
Post by SimSim on Mar 4, 2009 20:39:59 GMT -5
What about those submissions that have multiple submissions in them, they good or no?
|
|
|
Post by Distind on Mar 4, 2009 20:53:06 GMT -5
What about those submissions that have multiple submissions in them, they good or no? If they have the names in them, and it's needed for context, yes. Otherwise, kill the damn thing. We have enough blobs of text floating around.
|
|
|
Post by SimSim on Mar 4, 2009 20:58:17 GMT -5
Good, I got tired of trying to hunt up 4 or more posts.
|
|
|
Post by masfina on Mar 5, 2009 12:00:55 GMT -5
Over Here! Me, look at me!
MasFina
I can has public mod privileges? I have been at the old site for a while with the requisite 25+ posts.
|
|
|
Post by kiwimac on Mar 5, 2009 19:59:35 GMT -5
Me too!
|
|
|
Post by Distind on Mar 5, 2009 20:22:37 GMT -5
Over Here! Me, look at me! MasFina I can has public mod privileges? I have been at the old site for a while with the requisite 25+ posts. No problem, you have an exemplary record. You're going to have to hold your right testical and swear seldge help you, that you will not approve everything. I'll keep tabs on your record, but I'll give you a shot. It's not just if it's fundie, but it has to be actually amusing or infuriating in some way. If it isn't, kill it. Once you've done that, check public admin, both accounts are open.
|
|
MysticalChicken
Junior Member
Current avatar: "Nina Hamnett With Guitar" by Roger Eliot Fry, c. 1917-18
Posts: 81
|
Post by MysticalChicken on Mar 5, 2009 20:33:20 GMT -5
I'm a bit torn on this. On the one hand, pub admin was quite fun to read.
On the other hand, I may have been one of those who, while possibly sleep-deprived, approved quotes that were Poe/joke/troll/whatever.
So I don't know whether I should even ask to be able to access it again.
|
|
|
Post by firthy2002 on Mar 5, 2009 22:54:35 GMT -5
Can I go back on PA please? Username on the forum is the same as here.
EDIT: By forum I mean the old forum on fstdt.com
|
|
|
Post by headache on Mar 6, 2009 16:15:31 GMT -5
It seems like there are some with pub admin privs that goes through every submission and blatantly hit the delete button for every article submitted.
|
|
|
Post by Distind on Mar 6, 2009 19:47:40 GMT -5
It seems like there are some with pub admin privs that goes through every submission and blatantly hit the delete button for every article submitted. No one is hitting them on ALL of them, but a couple folks(who i knew well ahead of time are pretty brutal, but a few of those can't hurt) are only approving a select few and deleting pretty much everything else they come across. That said, you're in sixth for highest approval attempts percentage, behind a couple people who haven't done anything but approve(though they generally don't have many). What I'm particularly happy with right now is that there's a balance between the two extremes, I know better than to expec to be rid of them. I may actually drop the approval cap to 20 this weekend, given the balance is not so horrific any more and see how that goes. I've got to review some data to see if it's worth it or not. Just a sec mysticalchicken and firthy, I'm going to check the old records and see how you're ranked.
|
|
|
Post by Distind on Mar 6, 2009 19:54:36 GMT -5
Ok boys, Firthy's got a decent record, and mystical you'res is kinda short with a decent rating for how many you voted in actually getting in. EDIT: Which means you're old accounts are rolling.
Odds are I'll let things run for another week or three before any heads roll if they're going to. So take your time, check the sources(already had one fuckup I've been alerted of), and generally don't approve every piece of mundane repeated crap, and you'll do well.
|
|