|
Post by chancellorgorkon on Apr 1, 2009 9:26:26 GMT -5
Otherwise...here come some good Fundie quotes! www.christiandomesticdiscipline.com/home1.html"This site is meant to be a haven for married couples who practice safe and consensual Christian Domestic Discipline, or for those who would like to learn more about it."
|
|
|
Post by Madame Scarlet on Apr 1, 2009 9:29:27 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by m52nickerson on Apr 1, 2009 9:32:01 GMT -5
It does not look like a poe, but it is hard to tell.
|
|
|
Post by devilschaplain2 on Apr 1, 2009 10:01:47 GMT -5
Okay, this is a Poe site. (You're welcome
|
|
|
Post by antichrist on Apr 1, 2009 17:32:01 GMT -5
I know I got in shit for saying this before. But I still see it as BDSM D/S dressed up in Sunday clothes.
They're just trying to legitimize their kink so that they're not like them "filthy liberal perverts".
|
|
|
Post by katsuro on Apr 2, 2009 15:29:58 GMT -5
I know I got in shit for saying this before. But I still see it as BDSM D/S dressed up in Sunday clothes. They're just trying to legitimize their kink so that they're not like them "filthy liberal perverts". ^This. I'm 100% certain it's little more than a fetish site. And a lame one too - where's all the goddamn F/F spanking videos?! Sons of bitches.
|
|
D'Coke
Full Member
In the service of the Church of Darwinian Materialism
Posts: 106
|
Post by D'Coke on Apr 3, 2009 3:27:51 GMT -5
Christian BDSM is very real. It's kind of funny and I agree that religion seems like an excuse to play rough without looking like a deviant. But I think this is progress - heck, they spank! I always thought that some of the stuff in the bible should be seen and practised for what it is - kink, BDSM etc.
|
|
|
Post by mice34 on Apr 3, 2009 23:56:03 GMT -5
"But I think this is progress - heck, they spank! "
Yeah, but it's only for submissive woman and dominant men. I'm dubious how much is consensual b/c they preach women don't have the right to refuse it and be right with God.
|
|
Sayna
Junior Member
Posts: 70
|
Post by Sayna on Apr 4, 2009 4:09:21 GMT -5
This is not a parody. See: Feministing.com | Wife-Spanking 101: Neither Parody Nor Porn, a post from a feminist blog about this site. It points out various scary, misogynistic things, such as what madamescarlet mentioned, the fact that the only reason they don't support forcing it is because it's illegal. That statement is actually still on the site: They took it down! Here's what it says now: And what it used to say: Try as I might, I can't find that article they mention.
|
|
D'Coke
Full Member
In the service of the Church of Darwinian Materialism
Posts: 106
|
Post by D'Coke on Apr 4, 2009 21:51:54 GMT -5
But if that's what they read in the bible, you can't expect them to deny it. And yet they still care about consent. They didn't write the bible.
As for it being male/female, well ,again - bible. Still consent. I'm not one to care about someone's ideals and kicks as long as it stays personal.
|
|
|
Post by delirium on Apr 5, 2009 10:34:55 GMT -5
This is proof that The Story of O and the Bible do. not. mix.
|
|
|
Post by gadfly on Apr 7, 2009 13:14:39 GMT -5
If a couple consensually enjoys spanking as a part of erotic play, I'm all for it, as long as no one is getting seriously injured or crippled. That goes for a Christian or non-Christian marriage.
But this "Domestic Discipline" thing IS wrong to me, because it is so one-sided and so patronizing towards the woman. The woman in a marriage is not a little child, to be corrected by her husband with a spanking. She's a grown, mature human being and should be spoken to and interacted with as such. This is the same to me as that advice for women about pouting and acting like a little girl when they're angry with their husbands. Only a severely disturbed man, IMHO, would want a constantly infantilized wife who acted like a child and who he had to bend over his knee for the slightest infraction. It's almost, but not quite, pedophilic.
And besides, why would a person want to mix erotic play with real-life stuff? Keep spankings in the fantasy world and in the bedroom, not for an argument or burning the toast during breakfast.
Another thing, what about guys who want to be dominated or spanked by their wives? This "Christian Domestic Discipline" would seem to have no answers for such a situation because it relies on such a warped interpretation of the Bible and of BDSM relationships.
To sum up: Bondage play good, Christian Domestic Discipline BAD.
|
|
|
Post by szaleniec on Apr 7, 2009 13:24:25 GMT -5
The phrase "non-consensual consent" puts me in mind of the knots that fan fiction writers tie themselves in so they can argue that they're not really perverts because they're not really writing about Sephiroth raping Cloud, in the author's notes of a fic in which that's exactly what happens.
|
|
|
Post by Madame Scarlet on Apr 7, 2009 13:41:08 GMT -5
But this "Domestic Discipline" thing IS wrong to me, because it is so one-sided and so patronizing towards the woman. The woman in a marriage is not a little child, to be corrected by her husband with a spanking. She's a grown, mature human being and should be spoken to and interacted with as such. This is the same to me as that advice for women about pouting and acting like a little girl when they're angry with their husbands. Only a severely disturbed man, IMHO, would want a constantly infantilized wife who acted like a child and who he had to bend over his knee for the slightest infraction. It's almost, but not quite, pedophilic. I really don't see anything wrong with such a relationship, provided both parties want and consent to it. I don't consider it consent if the woman is convinced that she has to do it to be right with god. But if two partners are into infantilization and punishment, not just in the bedroom but as a lifestyle, and they have a way of stopping it if necessary (like a safeword), I don't see anything wrong with it. To say that that is how all relationships ought to be, though, is wrong.
|
|
|
Post by perv on Apr 7, 2009 14:27:31 GMT -5
That's what I was going to say. Who says they need to strictly separate "erotic play" from "real life"? And for that matter, if they want to have a Daddly/lil girl relationship, that's fine too. Different strokes and all that.
|
|