|
Post by booley on Mar 7, 2011 0:56:49 GMT -5
why do I feel as if there's some subtext I am missing here?
|
|
|
Post by Dragon Zachski on Mar 7, 2011 3:29:04 GMT -5
That's because the picture is 100% subtext and indecipherable to anyone who's not in the know.
I'm not in the know. :<
|
|
|
Post by Jodie on Mar 7, 2011 15:38:32 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Jodie on Mar 7, 2011 15:40:32 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Vene on Mar 7, 2011 16:40:53 GMT -5
Except the data shows the opposite for Obama.
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon the Clown on Mar 7, 2011 17:47:08 GMT -5
Dammit, Vene. Stop getting facts in the way of political cartoons!
|
|
storymoron
Full Member
Guy-liking, God-believing, liberal-minded freak
Posts: 187
|
Post by storymoron on Mar 7, 2011 18:34:14 GMT -5
Well then, Mr. Drawer-guy, why don't you move to Libya, and live under its less-crazy ruler?
|
|
|
Post by worlder on Mar 7, 2011 19:04:14 GMT -5
Bennet I love your style. Less words in a political cartoon, the better.
|
|
|
Post by nickiknack on Mar 7, 2011 19:05:54 GMT -5
Yeah, because it would be all rainbows & flowers under Republican policy . Last time I checked Obama's policy is republican policy lite, but silly me, that would mean that your policy fails also.
|
|
|
Post by Smurfette Principle on Mar 9, 2011 21:29:55 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by CtraK on Mar 10, 2011 8:53:50 GMT -5
Martin Rowson in the Guardian again... ...essentially the cartoon equivalent to something from The Bomb Squad, and all the more awesome for it.
|
|
|
Post by booley on Mar 11, 2011 16:25:22 GMT -5
Do I really need to explain this?
|
|
|
Post by aaa on Mar 12, 2011 7:49:20 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by chad sexington on Mar 12, 2011 8:42:45 GMT -5
Man, that's a harsh one.
|
|
|
Post by Shane for Wax on Mar 12, 2011 9:01:40 GMT -5
|
|