|
|
Post by Shane for Wax on Oct 20, 2011 3:50:20 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Shane for Wax on Oct 24, 2011 6:41:03 GMT -5
Double post on toast:  I'm not sure it counts as a protest sign per se... |
|
|
|
Post by priestling on Oct 24, 2011 12:08:20 GMT -5
That's clever, if nothing else.
|
|
|
|
Post by Yla on Oct 24, 2011 13:47:40 GMT -5
And it isn't in there in the first place...
It's well-meaning, but they're still implying that 'God hates fags' is sound dogma, perpetuating the stereotype. And that typo bit is, while funny, obviously an argument not to be taken seriously, and thus weak and unlikely to convince anyone who actually believes that.
|
|
|
|
Post by Oriet on Oct 24, 2011 17:05:25 GMT -5
Wasn't it a fig tree that Jesus wilted cause it wasn't bearing fruit out of season?
|
|
|
|
Post by Thejebusfire on Oct 24, 2011 17:10:32 GMT -5
Yes! That just proves that God hates figs!
|
|
|
|
Post by N. De Plume on Oct 24, 2011 19:20:47 GMT -5
Wasn't it a fig tree that Jesus wilted cause it wasn't bearing fruit out of season? I think this makes that sign a bit of a “Viewers Are Geniuses” joke. |
|
|
|
Post by anti-nonsense on Oct 27, 2011 6:35:23 GMT -5
And it isn't in there in the first place... It's well-meaning, but they're still implying that 'God hates fags' is sound dogma, perpetuating the stereotype. And that typo bit is, while funny, obviously an argument not to be taken seriously, and thus weak and unlikely to convince anyone who actually believes that. nothing is likely to convince those kinds of people anyway so it doesn't really matter. |
|
|
|
Post by Shane for Wax on Oct 27, 2011 6:47:12 GMT -5
And it isn't in there in the first place... It's well-meaning, but they're still implying that 'God hates fags' is sound dogma, perpetuating the stereotype. And that typo bit is, while funny, obviously an argument not to be taken seriously, and thus weak and unlikely to convince anyone who actually believes that. It's not a real sign anyways, so take it with a grain of salt. |
|
|
|
Post by Yla on Oct 27, 2011 8:05:34 GMT -5
And it isn't in there in the first place... It's well-meaning, but they're still implying that 'God hates fags' is sound dogma, perpetuating the stereotype. And that typo bit is, while funny, obviously an argument not to be taken seriously, and thus weak and unlikely to convince anyone who actually believes that. It's not a real sign anyways, so take it with a grain of salt. Photoshop should leave watermarks. |
|
|
|
Post by lighthorseman on Oct 27, 2011 8:18:52 GMT -5
Wasn't it a fig tree that Jesus wilted cause it wasn't bearing fruit out of season? |
|
|
|
Post by Shane for Wax on Oct 27, 2011 8:56:41 GMT -5
It's not a real sign anyways, so take it with a grain of salt. Photoshop should leave watermarks. says-it.com/churchsigns should have been a little obvious... |
|
|
|
Post by Smurfette Principle on Oct 28, 2011 0:50:37 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Shane for Wax on Oct 30, 2011 2:40:43 GMT -5
 Not really a sign but... |
|
|
|
Post by RavynousHunter on Oct 30, 2011 3:24:37 GMT -5
Why is "let the people vote" in quotes? Is it some kind of ironic voting? Is the wink implied?
|
|
