Post by Professor Cold Heart on Nov 25, 2010 8:52:55 GMT -5
Got a kick out of this Anglo-Saxon Foundation discussion I found on Google. It's gone from the forum now, but Google still has a cache of page 2:
www.uepengland.com/bbs/index.php/topic/21238-wikipedia-anti-english/page__st__20
They seem to be trying to rewrite history and change the truths.
I think we need to keep an eye on Wikipedia, its full of anti-English articles and twisted facts!
So what's their beef? Youngy1979 (this guy) explains:
What Youngy clearly doesn't realise is that Islam4UK warrants a Wikipedia article because it was a very controversial group in its time which was covered by the news media, while this English Shieldwall outfit... isn't. I think Wikipedia's "non-notable" judgement is spot-on.
But logic never stopped a good conspiracy theory:
SN Admin describes "Wikiproject Deletionsorting/England" as - sinisterly - "a dedicated page for monitoring pages concerning England". Wonder what he makes of the identically-structured pages monitoring pages concerning Denmark, Nigeria, Terkmenistan, poetry and wrestling.
And the owner of it should remember that he wouldn't even be able set up Wikipedia and express his views if it wasn't for our ethnic English fathers and grandfathers and the allies freeing his country from Nazi oppression. The owner of wikipedia and those with a vested interest in it, if they were around during WWII they would probably have been Nazi collaborates.
Rock on, you guys. Rock on.
www.uepengland.com/bbs/index.php/topic/21238-wikipedia-anti-english/page__st__20
Youngy1979 said:
Its full of Jewish attempts of world domination called Goy cabal They seem to be trying to rewrite history and change the truths.
I think we need to keep an eye on Wikipedia, its full of anti-English articles and twisted facts!
Guthlac said:
It seems wikipedia is another arm of the corrupt liberal media that is infesting everywhere. It is obvious now that it is a politicly motivated Organisation.So what's their beef? Youngy1979 (this guy) explains:
I began a whole new page and when I checked today;
July 2010
upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/28/Information.svg/25px-Information.svg.png Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Shield wall. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Wikipedia articles are not the place for right-wing propaganda and ethnic whining. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 19:10, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f7/Nuvola_apps_important.svg/25px-Nuvola_apps_important.svg.png Please stop. If you continue to add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Shield wall, you may be blocked from editing. Drmies (talk) 20:09, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion nomination of English Shieldwall
upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/15/Ambox_warning_pn.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_pn.svg.png A tag has been placed on English Shieldwall requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guidelines for people and for organizations. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Drmies (talk) 03:08, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
Drmies must be one of the admin of Wikepedia because it was reported by a member called 'ladyshallom'.
What about Islam4uk then? My link
Wikipedia is pure anti-English!
July 2010
upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/28/Information.svg/25px-Information.svg.png Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Shield wall. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Wikipedia articles are not the place for right-wing propaganda and ethnic whining. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 19:10, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f7/Nuvola_apps_important.svg/25px-Nuvola_apps_important.svg.png Please stop. If you continue to add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Shield wall, you may be blocked from editing. Drmies (talk) 20:09, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion nomination of English Shieldwall
upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/15/Ambox_warning_pn.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_pn.svg.png A tag has been placed on English Shieldwall requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guidelines for people and for organizations. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Drmies (talk) 03:08, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
Drmies must be one of the admin of Wikepedia because it was reported by a member called 'ladyshallom'.
What about Islam4uk then? My link
Wikipedia is pure anti-English!
What Youngy clearly doesn't realise is that Islam4UK warrants a Wikipedia article because it was a very controversial group in its time which was covered by the news media, while this English Shieldwall outfit... isn't. I think Wikipedia's "non-notable" judgement is spot-on.
But logic never stopped a good conspiracy theory:
Guthlac said:
Yes, Wikipedia is racist against ethnic English and it's promotes mad terrorist groups such as Islam4uk. Any reporter worth their salt would investigate Wickipedia and find who and what are behind it and who they are linked too and their backers. I bet it would be a real eye opener.Witnere said:
Wikipedia is very leftist and anti-Anglo-Saxon in it's leanings. That there would be people of Jewish heritage in a racist leftist concern is no suprise. Karl Marx, Leon Trotsky and Vladimir Lenin all shared Jewish heritage in common. And Communism has always seen the Anglo-Saxon world with it's insistence on personal freedoms as it's biggest enemy.SN Admin describes "Wikiproject Deletionsorting/England" as - sinisterly - "a dedicated page for monitoring pages concerning England". Wonder what he makes of the identically-structured pages monitoring pages concerning Denmark, Nigeria, Terkmenistan, poetry and wrestling.
Witnere said:
SN, that puts the tin hat on it for me. They are guilty as charged with Anglophobia. They actively monitor and delete articles designed to enhance English conciousness. GRRR!Guthlac said:
Bastards! The amount of s....t they have on their sight and willingness to listen to some pc Anglophobes is is indicative that they are in the hands of the liberal media, pc brigade and EU. Fro an organisation that say sit against censorship it does a lot of agilest the ethnci English.And the owner of it should remember that he wouldn't even be able set up Wikipedia and express his views if it wasn't for our ethnic English fathers and grandfathers and the allies freeing his country from Nazi oppression. The owner of wikipedia and those with a vested interest in it, if they were around during WWII they would probably have been Nazi collaborates.
Rock on, you guys. Rock on.
