|
Post by Tiger on Mar 23, 2010 15:50:03 GMT -5
So... I know I'm getting a biased sampling, but are teabaggers really just that bad at spelling?
|
|
|
Post by Thejebusfire on Mar 23, 2010 15:54:00 GMT -5
Just because you don't agree with the president, doesn't mean you still can't have enough respect for him to atleast spell his name right.
|
|
|
Post by Vypernight on Mar 23, 2010 15:58:43 GMT -5
And when you do it, you're an asshole. And when those "Americans" do it to take away things that benefit everyone, take away rights, use violence and a display of aggression while screaming at everyone all while basically doing this based on word of mouth and opinion without really knowing why...you wonder why you're viewed as thugs? Let's see, protest a bill that steals rights from citizens and an illegal, mistake of a war...well, that sounds pretty just and right Protest giving gays rights and giving everyone access to health care is somehow...good too? I don't think so Yeah, they want gay marriage and abortion banned, but touch their guns or, as you said, provide health care, and suddenly we're taking THEIR right away.
|
|
|
Post by Nihilist on Mar 23, 2010 16:02:45 GMT -5
So... I know I'm getting a biased sampling, but are teabaggers really just that bad at spelling? I'd have a hard time spelling if I had balls in my face constantly.
|
|
|
Post by Ian1732 on Mar 24, 2010 16:52:11 GMT -5
Jesus Christ, why did I have such a hard time finding this thread again?
|
|
|
Post by cagnazzo on Mar 24, 2010 17:43:29 GMT -5
Yeah, they want gay marriage and abortion banned, but touch their guns or, as you said, provide health care, and suddenly we're taking THEIR right away. Touching their guns would be taking their rights away, though. But I've actually not seen many/any anti 2nd amendment protests. The only "liberal" protests I've seen recently are against cutting education funding and prop 8, as I'm generally in California. As opposed to all these protests against health care, for prop eight, and against abortion. All of which are awful things to protest against/for.
|
|
|
Post by Thejebusfire on Mar 24, 2010 20:54:33 GMT -5
Well, at least she admits it. Ah, the classics!
|
|
|
Post by DeadpanDoubter on Mar 24, 2010 21:22:44 GMT -5
Ah, the classics! Psssh, that's so obviously faked. The wimmins are wearing pants! Didn't wimmin all wear perfectly pressed dresses back then?
|
|
|
Post by RavynousHunter on Mar 25, 2010 2:10:34 GMT -5
If they're not wearing dresses, then they're lesbians, and therefore evil.
[/50s_rhetoric]
|
|
|
Post by jaHer on Mar 25, 2010 7:28:29 GMT -5
I do not like that sign asking me the think of the children, and then immediately demanding I teabag the future. Excuse me, doucheface86, but I don't think suggesting I beat down and teabag future children is appealing to me.
|
|
|
Post by chad sexington on Mar 25, 2010 8:15:35 GMT -5
psst, I'm pretty sure the 'teabag the future' sign was a joke. Like all those lemon party flyers that were being distributed.
|
|
|
Post by Vene on Mar 25, 2010 10:36:43 GMT -5
psst, I'm pretty sure the 'teabag the future' sign was a joke. Like all those lemon party flyers that were being distributed. Look up the Biblical verse on the sign next to it, it's the one about smashing babies against rocks. The "right wing extremist" might be legit, however.
|
|
|
Post by jaHer on Mar 25, 2010 11:13:16 GMT -5
psst, I'm pretty sure the 'teabag the future' sign was a joke. Like all those lemon party flyers that were being distributed. I did laugh, one way or another 8)
|
|
|
Post by secretsquirrelsock on Apr 2, 2010 11:45:14 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by MaybeNever on Apr 2, 2010 16:40:52 GMT -5
I love the phrase "teabonics".
|
|