|
|
Post by Shane for Wax on Jun 2, 2011 16:10:48 GMT -5
I think in this kind of case it's safe to say it isn't about the safety. This case is not about saftey. It is about the well-to-do people who live near Lake Eola not wanting the homeless there. Tis my point. |
|
|
|
Post by Radiation on Jun 2, 2011 16:38:09 GMT -5
I think in this kind of case it's safe to say it isn't about the safety. This case is not about saftey. It is about the well-to-do people who live near Lake Eola not wanting the homeless there. Classism at it's best, eh? |
|
|
|
Post by wmdkitty on Jun 2, 2011 22:54:19 GMT -5
What... why... but... what the fuck, Florida? What the fuck? Are the homeless now considered not people?
|
|
|
|
Post by MaybeNever on Jun 2, 2011 22:55:34 GMT -5
Eating: now reserved for the propertied classes!
|
|
|
|
Post by The_L on Jun 3, 2011 8:48:47 GMT -5
I think in this kind of case it's safe to say it isn't about the safety. This case is not about saftey. It is about the well-to-do people who live near Lake Eola not wanting the homeless there. If they don't want to see homeless people, then they should start supporting social programs that help keep people from becoming homeless in the first place. |
|
|
|
Post by starseeker on Jun 3, 2011 9:11:02 GMT -5
This case is not about saftey. It is about the well-to-do people who live near Lake Eola not wanting the homeless there. If they don't want to see homeless people, then they should start supporting social programs that help keep people from becoming homeless in the first place. But that would be communist. </snark> |
|
|
|
Post by m52nickerson on Jun 3, 2011 10:09:41 GMT -5
What... why... but... what the fuck, Florida? What the fuck? Are the homeless now considered not people? This one is not all of Florida just Orlando. Plus the ordnance is not for the whole city, just certain areas. If they don't want to see homeless people, then they should start supporting social programs that help keep people from becoming homeless in the first place. That would take money, arresting people is cheaper. Those people around Lake Eola need to be able to pay for those new BMWs. |
|
|
|
Post by clockworkgirl21 on Jun 3, 2011 15:41:01 GMT -5
Also, to them, people are homeless because they're lazy and don't want to work.
|
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon the Clown on Jun 3, 2011 15:46:27 GMT -5
This case is not about saftey. It is about the well-to-do people who live near Lake Eola not wanting the homeless there. If they don't want to see homeless people, then they should start supporting social programs that help keep people from becoming homeless in the first place. That would require admitting that Saint Reagan was wrong to eviscerate the mental health programs in the US. It's a huge factor for there being so many homeless. |
|
|
|
Post by ltfred on Jun 3, 2011 16:05:54 GMT -5
This case is not about saftey. It is about the well-to-do people who live near Lake Eola not wanting the homeless there. If they don't want to see homeless people, then they should start supporting social programs that help keep people from becoming homeless in the first place. Executing the poor through starvation policies is more cheap. |
|
|
|
Post by MaybeNever on Jun 3, 2011 23:28:15 GMT -5
When I give food to the poor, they call me a saint. When I ask why the poor have nothing to eat, they call me a communist.
|
|
|
|
Post by tolpuddlemartyr on Jun 4, 2011 0:43:09 GMT -5
I think in this kind of case it's safe to say it isn't about the safety. This case is not about saftey. It is about the well-to-do people who live near Lake Eola not wanting the homeless there. Yes but well to do people who want to remove the riff raff never call it that. |
|
|
|
Post by perv on Jun 5, 2011 22:21:53 GMT -5
Does anyone seriously believe the license is requires to protect the homeless from food poisoning?
|
|
|
|
Post by Mantorok on Jun 6, 2011 8:22:32 GMT -5
Does anyone seriously believe the license is requires to protect the homeless from food poisoning? The permit isn't for feeding the homeless. It's for feeding more than 25 people in a public park. That's very similar to legislation used elsewhere for food safety. The "screw the homeless" part is limiting an organisation to two permits annually for each park. |
|
