|
Post by Vene on Jun 3, 2011 17:19:05 GMT -5
Too bad that is not how it works, a system like that only breeds better and harder criminals. Paying for rehabilitation means they won't do stupid shit again (especially if they did the crime as a means to survive without said education and job). And our society doesn't make it feasible for a lot of people to get education when they have to work 60 hours a week to pay for rent, food, and transportation. Education is only an option when you're already ahead in some manner. I thought that that was the point of the comment; to educate people with a system equal to that of, say, high school. It is talking about cutting the funding to prisons, which will reduce what can be done with them. Schools don't have to give food for free, schools don't provide medical care, they don't provide housing, they aren't open 24/7/365. Bringing the funding per prisoner down to $7000 will destroy the prison system. ETA: The comment was also implying that by making prison conditions worse people will work or go to school instead. Which doesn't necessarily happen if they can't get a job and/or if they can't afford to both work and go to school.
|
|
|
Post by perv on Jun 5, 2011 22:23:57 GMT -5
Aren't public schools basically low security prisons already?
|
|
|
Post by ltfred on Jun 6, 2011 7:27:54 GMT -5
Aren't public schools basically low security prisons already? No. They're suboptimal educators*, but they do educate. For instance, compare the literacy rate of the US and a country without a large public system like Haiti. *Due to underfunding, badly paid teachers and so on.
|
|
|
Post by Vene on Jun 6, 2011 10:22:19 GMT -5
Depends on the school, if it's in a poor neighborhood, then the school sucks. If it is in middle class or better, the school is as good as, or better, than other school systems in the West.
|
|