|
Post by lighthorseman on Jul 5, 2011 17:48:03 GMT -5
*rolls eyes* OK, I'm sorry I posted the whole thing in its entirety, it wasn't my intention to break the rule. However, the entirety of the article needs to be read to see my point.
Not just that this was a particularly violent and vicious attack (which it was) as is made out in the part Oriet snipped out, but the way the police responded to it, which isn't discussed until further into the body of the article.
|
|
|
Post by Shane for Wax on Jul 5, 2011 17:48:54 GMT -5
*rolls eyes* OK, I'm sorry I posted the whole thing in its entirety, it wasn't my intention to break the rule. However, the entirety of the article needs to be read to see my point. Not just that this was a particularly violent and vicious attack (which it was) as is made out in the part Oriet snipped out, but the way the police responded to it, which isn't discussed until further into the body of the article. Because we are so incapable of clicking our mouse on the article link. You think we're dumb as rocks?
|
|
|
Post by ironbite on Jul 5, 2011 17:49:24 GMT -5
Yes...yes he does.
Ironbite-cause he is.
|
|
|
Post by lighthorseman on Jul 5, 2011 17:50:38 GMT -5
*rolls eyes* OK, I'm sorry I posted the whole thing in its entirety, it wasn't my intention to break the rule. However, the entirety of the article needs to be read to see my point. Not just that this was a particularly violent and vicious attack (which it was) as is made out in the part Oriet snipped out, but the way the police responded to it, which isn't discussed until further into the body of the article. Because we are so incapable of clicking our mouse on the article link. You think we're dumb as rocks? Some, yes. But I was just trying to present it in a convenient format. I even upsized the font. I didn't expect people to take it as a personal affront.
|
|
|
Post by lighthorseman on Jul 5, 2011 17:51:23 GMT -5
Yes...yes he does. Ironbite-cause he is. So how is THIS not "flame baiting"?
|
|
|
Post by Vene on Jul 5, 2011 17:51:36 GMT -5
Because we are so incapable of clicking our mouse on the article link. You think we're dumb as rocks? Some, yes. We're not the one who was unable to see what rule we're violating when it gets pointed out. Repeatedly.
|
|
|
Post by ironbite on Jul 5, 2011 17:52:43 GMT -5
Yes...yes he does. Ironbite-cause he is. So how is THIS not "flame baiting"? Cause I'm not talking at you but about you. Ironbite-now go delete some more posts so you can be the "bigger man".
|
|
|
Post by lighthorseman on Jul 5, 2011 17:53:00 GMT -5
We're not the one who was unable to see what rule we're violating when it gets pointed out. Repeatedly. Guideline.
|
|
|
Post by ironbite on Jul 5, 2011 17:53:47 GMT -5
Hey who predicted that?
Ironbite-I owe you a steak.
|
|
|
Post by Damen on Jul 5, 2011 17:53:57 GMT -5
We're not the one who was unable to see what rule we're violating when it gets pointed out. Repeatedly. Guideline. Part of the rules, dickhead.
|
|
|
Post by Vene on Jul 5, 2011 17:54:06 GMT -5
We're not the one who was unable to see what rule we're violating when it gets pointed out. Repeatedly. Guideline. You are an obtuse twit
|
|
|
Post by lighthorseman on Jul 5, 2011 17:55:22 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Vene on Jul 5, 2011 17:56:01 GMT -5
Yeah, but it's not very fitting, obtuse twit works so much better. Also more fun to say.
|
|
|
Post by ironbite on Jul 5, 2011 17:56:33 GMT -5
I prefer petulant child
Ironbite-which is what you are.
|
|
|
Post by Shane for Wax on Jul 5, 2011 17:57:14 GMT -5
I prefer obtuse twit who gives Australians a bad name. Which is what you are in spades. Twit.
|
|