|
Post by itachirumon on Sept 12, 2011 23:15:21 GMT -5
What would count for standing is a woman who (1) got pregnant, had a miscarriage, and was prosecuted for manslaughter, or (2) got pregnant, had an abortion, and was prosecuted for murder. MANSLAUGHTER? That bitch should get the chair! We value life and we're not afraid to KILL YOU over it! ....Sorry, my sarcasm level seems to be stuck at 11. Wooden Bender: I say we need to teach everybody our peaceful ways... by force!
|
|
|
Post by Amaranth on Sept 15, 2011 7:49:45 GMT -5
To a degree, I can kind of agree with this definition. Before everyone flames me though, let me explain. As science inevitably moves forward things like cloning will inevitably become a reality. Similarly genetic and cellular manipulation will probably allow for people to splice their genes into a blank egg and in effect clone a child to be their offspring. These would all be good things particularly in helping couples unable to have children to have genetically related offspring. I feel that giving these clones and genetically manipulated children equal rights and for them to be recognized as fully human would be essential. You're SILLY.
|
|
|
Post by Ranger Joe on Sept 15, 2011 8:49:56 GMT -5
Oh look. Legislation designed by people who should have been swallowed or shot across their mother's tits as opposed to not pulling out.
Stay classy Mississippi. I'm so glad I don't live there....
|
|
|
Post by cestlefun17 on Sept 15, 2011 12:14:42 GMT -5
Even a cloned person would have to be "born" at some point. Even if s/he doesn't come out of a woman's body but out of a test tube, s/he is "born" at some point. Any autonomous, sentient baby, cloned or not, is considered a "person" under the 14th Amendment and is entitled to the equal protection of the law while on American soil, just like any other person. This proposed amendment wouldn't give anybody more rights.
Roe v. Wade explicitly establishes that a fetus is not a person. Only a post-natal member of the species homo sapiens is legally a person. If a fetus is considered a person, its life cannot be taken away without due process of law. If this amendment were to be considered valid, a fetus' life could only be taken away if it committed a capital crime. Which is ludicrous. (EDIT: And the Supreme Court case Roper v. Simmons prohibits the use of the death penalty against criminals who committed their crime as minors.)
*Sigh.*
|
|