|
Post by gyeonghwa on Sept 14, 2011 14:14:42 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Vene on Sept 14, 2011 14:28:27 GMT -5
I honestly find it annoying people focus on the fluorescence as if that was the important part of it. It's a standard molecular biology technique and has been in use for years now. There was even a Nobel prize awarded for it a few years back. This is not a novel thing anymore.
|
|
|
Post by Dragon Zachski on Sept 14, 2011 15:46:41 GMT -5
I honestly find it annoying people focus on the fluorescence as if that was the important part of it. It's a standard molecular biology technique and has been in use for years now. There was even a Nobel prize awarded for it a few years back. This is not a novel thing anymore. But... but... but... Glow in the dark kitties! But seriously, this sounds awesome. The HIV/FIV part.
|
|
|
Post by Amaranth on Sept 14, 2011 15:47:44 GMT -5
Holy fuck, that would be creepy coming at me at three in the morning.
|
|
|
Post by Rat Of Steel on Sept 15, 2011 23:25:01 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by MaybeNever on Sept 15, 2011 23:30:56 GMT -5
I honestly find it annoying people focus on the fluorescence as if that was the important part of it. It's a standard molecular biology technique and has been in use for years now. There was even a Nobel prize awarded for it a few years back. This is not a novel thing anymore. Just because something is old doesn't mean it's not awesome, even if it's totally secondary. Besides, cat + other interesting thing = incredibly interesting thing.
|
|
|
Post by Undecided on Sept 16, 2011 18:23:14 GMT -5
I honestly find it annoying people focus on the fluorescence as if that was the important part of it. It's a standard molecular biology technique and has been in use for years now. There was even a Nobel prize awarded for it a few years back. This is not a novel thing anymore. Just because something is old doesn't mean it's not awesome, even if it's totally secondary. Besides, cat + other interesting thing = incredibly interesting thing. Public sees glowing animals --> public supports future fundamental research in molecular biology
|
|
|
Post by DeadpanDoubter on Sept 16, 2011 18:50:40 GMT -5
The comments section disagrees, Undecided.
|
|
|
Post by Amaranth on Sept 16, 2011 19:10:55 GMT -5
The comments section disagrees, Undecided. DEMON KITTEH! FAR WERS DEN LAZOR KITTEH
|
|
|
Post by DeadpanDoubter on Sept 16, 2011 19:13:34 GMT -5
The comments section disagrees, Undecided. DEMON KITTEH! FAR WERS DEN LAZOR KITTEH No, it's more the "HOMG EVIL SCIENTISTS TORTURING KITTIES LIKE THEY DO RATS HOW DARE THEY KITTIES ARE PETS!!!"
|
|
|
Post by Amaranth on Sept 16, 2011 19:15:56 GMT -5
DEMON KITTEH! FAR WERS DEN LAZOR KITTEH No, it's more the "HOMG EVIL SCIENTISTS TORTURING KITTIES LIKE THEY DO RATS HOW DARE THEY KITTIES ARE PETS!!!" i liekz 2 pet kittehz
|
|
|
Post by Mira on Sept 16, 2011 19:19:50 GMT -5
Rats are way better pets than cats anyway.
|
|
|
Post by Amaranth on Sept 16, 2011 19:23:08 GMT -5
Rats are way better pets than cats anyway. Bite your tongue.
|
|
|
Post by MaybeNever on Sept 16, 2011 19:33:39 GMT -5
Rats are way better pets than cats anyway. Lies. Rats are awesome, but they are not better than cats.
|
|
|
Post by Dragon Zachski on Sept 16, 2011 23:46:50 GMT -5
Rats and cats are equally awesome as evidenced by the fact that they have 75% of the same letters.
|
|