|
|
Post by clockworkgirl21 on Dec 3, 2011 1:05:46 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by foolishwisdom on Dec 3, 2011 2:09:16 GMT -5
 There could be a hundred reasons how a student gets that much money, even less so if you were to call his parents, and you decide to go with one of the worst case scenarios on him? what a douche. "If you look for the bad in mankind expecting to find it, you surely will." |
|
|
|
Post by Thejebusfire on Dec 3, 2011 2:17:14 GMT -5
WHAT?
IS THAT EVEN LEGAL?
|
|
|
|
Post by clockworkgirl21 on Dec 3, 2011 2:20:39 GMT -5
What gets me is that a teenage girl could get into serious trouble for sending nude photos of herself to her boyfriend, but a teenage boy is forced to strip down in front of 5 adults and nothing happens.
|
|
|
|
Post by foolishwisdom on Dec 3, 2011 2:30:44 GMT -5
What gets me is that a teenage girl could get into serious trouble for sending nude photos of herself to her boyfriend, but a teenage boy is forced to strip down in front of 5 adults and nothing happens. 1. Women are "suppose" to be whores, so it's no surprise when they do such things. Men, however, go to a much higher standard, the male body is not as filthy as a woman's. 2. Non of the adults are homosexuals, so by that logic, they're not "pedophiles," in that they're attracted to boys regardless of age. So it's not like they're getting their jollies off watching him strip. If they do, they're probably most likely thinking about him being a woman...because that's more normal and natural. [Sarcasm Mode: Off] |
|
|
|
Post by shykid on Dec 3, 2011 2:41:06 GMT -5
In a word, no. Also, love your Dr. Steel avatar. |
|
|
|
Post by Smurfette Principle on Dec 3, 2011 2:45:25 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Admiral Lithp on Dec 3, 2011 2:46:48 GMT -5
What gets me is that a teenage girl could get into serious trouble for sending nude photos of herself to her boyfriend, but a teenage boy is forced to strip down in front of 5 adults and nothing happens. Umm...the boyfriend could get in just as much trouble, if not more. He is technically in possession of child pornography. The administration seems like it's a big, fucked-up mess, I wonder how they're still in action. |
|
|
|
Post by Smurfette Principle on Dec 3, 2011 2:48:36 GMT -5
What gets me is that a teenage girl could get into serious trouble for sending nude photos of herself to her boyfriend, but a teenage boy is forced to strip down in front of 5 adults and nothing happens. Umm...the boyfriend could get in just as much trouble, if not more. He is technically in possession of child pornography. Yeah, and she'd be in trouble for possession and creation. |
|
|
|
Post by clockworkgirl21 on Dec 3, 2011 2:50:22 GMT -5
Well, the point still stands. The girl and her boyfriend and both in trouble even though no one was hurt. It's a victimless crime.
Then a boy is forced to strip to his underwear, and nothing is done about it.
|
|
|
|
Post by ironbite on Dec 3, 2011 2:52:51 GMT -5
I'm so glad this school district volunteered to basically finance this kid's future for the rest of his life.
Ironbite-in this day and age I'm so glad we've got people like this who'll just...give so generously.
|
|
|
|
Post by Admiral Lithp on Dec 3, 2011 2:55:43 GMT -5
Okay, so we weren't talking about a gender thing here? I was confused, because that seemed to be emphasized.
Wait, they faced no consequences for this?
|
|
|
|
Post by Smurfette Principle on Dec 3, 2011 2:55:45 GMT -5
I'm so glad this school district volunteered to basically finance this kid's future for the rest of his life. Ironbite-in this day and age I'm so glad we've got people like this who'll just...give so generously. ...what? |
|
|
|
Post by Admiral Lithp on Dec 3, 2011 2:56:36 GMT -5
I think he's assuming they'll be sued for all they're worth, as the expression goes.
|
|
|
|
Post by ironbite on Dec 3, 2011 2:56:55 GMT -5
This gross violation of this kids basic rights will fuel a multi-million dollar lawsuit that basically sets this kid up for life.
Ironbite-I couldn't be more clear.
|
|
