|
Post by schizophonic on Jul 18, 2009 8:48:29 GMT -5
Oh, we're going to play that game? Your statement "may have" been stupid and baseless. Placing a conditional before it doesn't really make it any less so. Are we done playing this game, or should I suggest that you "may have" molested children in the past? So now you're not only lying, but stating lies that were previously addressed and throughly refuted previously. Personal pet peeve, when someone gets caught in a lie or is refuted, then comes back and restates the exact same thing. It's horribly disingenuous. But Hell, most of that looks like the logical outcome of any plan, by any President, in any urgent situation. By the way, since I'm posting in this thread again, I love the duality presented by the link in the original post. Neil has previously panned the details in the Obama plan, and Congress' proposals, but now (and it's not the first time), he's made mention of glossing over the details. I doubt he's alone, but he's the one trying to be cute and clever here, so I'll point him out specifically as some fuckwit who seems to think that simultaneously, it's a rush job and too detailed. I understand that, Barrack being a negro, everything he does is evil and you desperately desire to put him between a rock and a hard place, but come on, guys. Do it in ways that aren't mutually exclusive, FFS. And Sky, I always figured you supported Romney because he was pro-rape, anti-woman, and anti-education. You strike me as the type who "might" enjoy all three in a Presidential candidate.
|
|
|
Post by dasfuchs on Jul 19, 2009 10:25:02 GMT -5
Like any good republican stooge/religious moron/troll does
|
|
|
Post by the sandman on Jul 19, 2009 12:26:49 GMT -5
And people wonder why I wanted Romney or Guiliani in the White House... They actually know how to handle money. Really? Gee Sky, we KNOW why you wanted Romney, that's a no-brainer. But Guiliani? You really wanted a guy who knowingly married his own cousin? Really?
|
|
|
Post by the sandman on Jul 19, 2009 12:31:00 GMT -5
Hah! I can do that too! Fox News may have covertly financed a massive expansion of white slavery in south east Asia! The Mormon Church may have killed 40,000 natives in Utah and buried their bodies in a mass pit just outside Salt Lake City! George W. Bush may have eaten the flesh of children in Satanic NASCAR orgies! You really think you can stick a "may have" in their and just say any old shit you like? What board do you think you're on?
|
|
|
Post by ironbite on Jul 19, 2009 13:26:10 GMT -5
Say mine is the drill that shall peirce the bullshit.
Ironbite-just for me.
|
|
|
Post by rookie on Jul 19, 2009 13:53:51 GMT -5
Sky, WTF, buddy? Drain the coffers? Are you freaking serious? Because that sounds an awful lot like saying I should blow off my mortgage because the price tag would drain my bank account. Is that whee you're going?
May have has been done by everyone else here, probably better than I could.
As to the rest of the bovine feces that dribbled out onto the boards, blame Obama for trying to do something constructive? Classy. Trying to give the man shit for recognizing that we need to unscrew ourselves and coming up with a plan to fix it is smooth, dude.
Also, thanks for the links you "may have" provided showing us how Obama's stimulus plans "may have" devastating effects. Shit, are you just transcribing Bill o'Riley's shows for us?
|
|
|
Post by MaybeNever on Jul 19, 2009 15:12:38 GMT -5
Also, thanks for the links you "may have" provided showing us how Obama's stimulus plans "may have" devastating effects. Shit, are you just transcribing Bill o'Riley's shows for us? That's cold. Bill O'Reilly just comes right out and says that Democrats eat babies/hate America/love evil/caused 9/11. He doesn't bother qualifying or softening the claims.
|
|
|
Post by schizophonic on Jul 19, 2009 16:23:44 GMT -5
Really? Gee Sky, we KNOW why you wanted Romney, that's a no-brainer. But Guiliani? You really wanted a guy who knowingly married his own cousin? Really? Pretty sure that's a pro for him. anyway, don't talk him out of it. I want famous crossdresser "Ruthy" on the national scene. That would be a bigger score for Obama than Sarah Impailin'. You really think you can stick a "may have" in their and just say any old shit you like? What board do you think you're on? I'm more curious what relaity he lives in where he thinks he's not going to get verbally destroyed for pulling disingenuous crap outside of the comfort of the usual sycophantic crap I'm sure he's used to. Really, I can only think of lack of mental faculties or flat-out trolling for sniping the same refuted bullshit over and over again. Sky, WTF, buddy? Drain the coffers? Are you freaking serious? Because that sounds an awful lot like saying I should blow off my mortgage because the price tag would drain my bank account. Is that whee you're going? May have has been done by everyone else here, probably better than I could. As to the rest of the bovine feces that dribbled out onto the boards, blame Obama for trying to do something constructive? Classy. Trying to give the man shit for recognizing that we need to unscrew ourselves and coming up with a plan to fix it is smooth, dude. Also, thanks for the links you "may have" provided showing us how Obama's stimulus plans "may have" devastating effects. Shit, are you just transcribing Bill o'Riley's shows for us? I may have disagreed with that post. nice point, though. "Let's not pay off the mortgage because it would cut into our monetaryassets!" Worst. Logic. Ever. Keep it in your pants, Ibby.
|
|
|
Post by ltfred on Jul 19, 2009 18:01:05 GMT -5
nice point, though. "Let's not pay off the mortgage because it would cut into our monetaryassets!" Worst. Logic. Ever. It's worse. The logic is more 'let's not get a mortgage in the first place, because we shouldn't live beyond our means.' Which would necessitate living on the street...
|
|
|
Post by dasfuchs on Jul 19, 2009 22:55:51 GMT -5
nice point, though. "Let's not pay off the mortgage because it would cut into our monetaryassets!" Worst. Logic. Ever. It's worse. The logic is more 'let's not get a mortgage in the first place, because we shouldn't live beyond our means.' Which would necessitate living on the street... Not really, I don't have a mortgage and live just fine on renting. Actually when all the bills are added up, depending on where I would live with a house, I'm saving money. but then again, for just me, i don't see the point of having a house when a few rooms suffice. Nor do I agree or want to encourage 100k price tags for shit homes
|
|
|
Post by ltfred on Jul 20, 2009 3:42:21 GMT -5
Not really, I don't have a mortgage and live just fine on renting. Actually when all the bills are added up, depending on where I would live with a house, I'm saving money. but then again, for just me, i don't see the point of having a house when a few rooms suffice. Nor do I agree or want to encourage 100k price tags for shit homes Well, renting is another option. But it's a choice nobody should chose simply because it means that you are 'living within your means'. Debt isn't a dirty word.
|
|
|
Post by schizophonic on Jul 20, 2009 8:52:03 GMT -5
Not really, I don't have a mortgage and live just fine on renting. Actually when all the bills are added up, depending on where I would live with a house, I'm saving money. but then again, for just me, i don't see the point of having a house when a few rooms suffice. Nor do I agree or want to encourage 100k price tags for shit homes Well, renting is another option. But it's a choice nobody should chose simply because it means that you are 'living within your means'. Debt isn't a dirty word. And all this from the guy who's talking about getting his MBA. Note that I think this is a valid point in terms of his current line of reasoning. If I were to mention I had a degree in engineering (I don't) or was going for one (I am not), I'd expect people to use my "credentials" against me when I started talking about how it was impossible to make an electric car.
|
|
|
Post by dasfuchs on Jul 20, 2009 11:33:00 GMT -5
Not really, I don't have a mortgage and live just fine on renting. Actually when all the bills are added up, depending on where I would live with a house, I'm saving money. but then again, for just me, i don't see the point of having a house when a few rooms suffice. Nor do I agree or want to encourage 100k price tags for shit homes Well, renting is another option. But it's a choice nobody should chose simply because it means that you are 'living within your means'. Debt isn't a dirty word. Oh, I'm already there, and suffer marks on credit history for it. To me it is a very dirty word
|
|
|
Post by Rime on Jul 20, 2009 12:00:53 GMT -5
It's ironic that several of those offering "rational resistance" to Obama's healthcare implementation are also those who would cry "an end to abortion can't happen soon enough! No cost is too high to save the LITTEL INNOCENT BABBYS!"
|
|
|
Post by schizophonic on Jul 20, 2009 15:50:47 GMT -5
It's ironic that several of those offering "rational resistance" to Obama's healthcare implementation are also those who would cry "an end to abortion can't happen soon enough! No cost is too high to save the LITTEL INNOCENT BABBYS!" Kinda like how we can't cover American Health Care, but no price is too high to rebuild Iraq. Even if it means the death of innoocent lives...Or for the Nationalists who only care about group involved, American lives.
|
|