|
Post by Admiral Lithp on Nov 11, 2009 0:02:30 GMT -5
Take this, John. Get a camera for an epic win.
|
|
|
Post by nautical999 on Nov 11, 2009 0:05:50 GMT -5
going to bed guys see you tomorrow
|
|
|
Post by davedan on Nov 11, 2009 0:08:55 GMT -5
davedan Yes if it is Gods will for him to see His power in this way and to prove to him that he does exist then yes he would intervene. But of course John would say it was just coincidence Left yourself an easy out there - if it is Gods will for him to see his power - if you lose - you just say it was god's will not to show his power that way and that you can't know God's will (although in other aspects you do claim too) How about you lock yourself in there mate?
|
|
|
Post by Admiral Lithp on Nov 11, 2009 0:27:33 GMT -5
When I saw the post, it just read "yes." Evidently, he realized his screw-up. Also, I love how he attempts to handwave the fact that he won't commit to a rational argument with "you won't believe me if I told you." Talk about preconceived notions.
|
|
|
Post by DarkfireTaimatsu on Nov 11, 2009 0:29:14 GMT -5
mag if you were given the choice what would you choose. lets stop the transgender talk and lets talk about choice. There is no choice. I am neither and I am both. If I were giving the choice, I would choose to have a vagina, a dick, and possibly small breasts. I would choose to go out as a man one day, a woman the next day, and wearing a male suit and a skirt the third day. I am not a man, I am not a woman, I am a something, I am a mirl, this is what I am. Really, it is very simple. In our IRC colloquialism, Magni is Magni.
|
|
|
Post by lonelocust on Nov 11, 2009 0:32:32 GMT -5
Funny thing, my first group was neo-hippie-stoner types, and we all ate healthy shit. I'm never touching brewer's yeast again. >.> I would always bring carrot sticks and OJ and shit to D&D games. Healthy shit while rolling the dice! It's good for you! Mmmmm!
|
|
|
Post by lonelocust on Nov 11, 2009 0:37:40 GMT -5
After that they were expelled from the garden where the womans curse was child birth and menstrations. The were told to be fruitful and multiply. Do you mean Sodom and Gamorrah? I know out board doesn't have a spellchecker embedded, but someone who has such a horriffic grasp of basic spelling and grammar and punctuation should really take the time to type their responses in Word or something and then C&P over. (I know you know how to C&P....) Every time you post crap like this you make yourself look stupider and stupider. He actually did say earlier that he didn't know what this "ctl + c ctl + v thing" meant. I believe it was in response to someone copypasting "Jesus Christ is come in the flesh" and asking if it counted if the only keystrokes they used was ctl + c ctl + v.
|
|
|
Post by lonelocust on Nov 11, 2009 0:46:42 GMT -5
magnazeal the only reason palygomy was allowed in biblical times was to populate the earth and nowhere in the bible doe sit speak about a relationship the way you guys have one as being ok. Far from it. It speaks of orgies and all being sin. We haven't had an orgy. We'd need at least two more spice to have an orgy. See, I always say that three is a threesome, and four is an orgy, but others say that four is a foursome and five is an orgy. How do we decide! But three is definitely not an orgy, despite what my roommate has to say about my birthday party.
|
|
|
Post by ironbite on Nov 11, 2009 0:48:27 GMT -5
BY HAVEING AN ORGY!
|
|
|
Post by lonelocust on Nov 11, 2009 0:57:29 GMT -5
Our luck, it will just end up being Heisenberg's orgy.
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon the Clown on Nov 11, 2009 1:36:06 GMT -5
NTC you make a very valid point and I applaud you for taking these things into concideration. I do have this one question for you though Would you like to have children? I never said it was sinful to not have children at all i just homosexuality is a sin. There are many great men even in the bible who did not have children. I don't particularly want children in the first place, no. But how is that even relevant to my question? Am I expected to remain celibate because I think it would be best for me to not have children? If not, why would my having sex using a condom with a woman who is on birthcontrol be any less bad than a couple of gay men having sex with each other?
|
|
|
Post by John E on Nov 11, 2009 1:41:01 GMT -5
davedan Yes if it is Gods will for him to see His power in this way and to prove to him that he does exist then yes he would intervene. But of course John would say it was just coincidence I know I said I was off for the night but... So if I flip the coins, even without praying, they'll land heads up to prove to me that Jesus is god? If this is what you're saying, I'll do it, video tape it so you can see, and if heads land up more often, by a statistically significant amount (any statisticians in the house want to tell me how much that would actually be?) I promise to rethink my stance on Christianity, stop bugging you for proof, and publicly state on this board that you are a true healer of God. Provided one thing... You promise that if the test fails (tails land up more or they come up the same within a statistical margin of error), you will rethink your beliefs, stop making supernatural claims without evidence, and publicly state on this board that you are a false prophet and god is a superstition. Do we have a deal?
|
|
|
Post by valsa on Nov 11, 2009 1:42:41 GMT -5
If not, why would my having sex using a condom with a woman who is on birthcontrol be any less bad than a couple of gay men having sex with each other? Because your way, if God really wanted it, she'd get pregnant anyway. He's like some dick that goes around poking holes into people's condoms.
|
|
|
Post by lonelocust on Nov 11, 2009 1:58:22 GMT -5
If not, why would my having sex using a condom with a woman who is on birthcontrol be any less bad than a couple of gay men having sex with each other? Because your way, if God really wanted it, she'd get pregnant anyway. He's like some dick that goes around poking holes into people's condoms. If god REALLY wanted lesbians to get pregnant, they would, too. Parthenogenesis is a remote possibility (it's been seen in every major group except for mammals and suspected in mammals), and even without parthenogenesis, Nautical's belief system allows for complete disregard of the usual natural order. Hell, if god REALLY wanted it, gay dudes could get pregnant too, because god can do, absolutely literally, anything.
|
|
|
Post by valsa on Nov 11, 2009 2:22:51 GMT -5
Because your way, if God really wanted it, she'd get pregnant anyway. He's like some dick that goes around poking holes into people's condoms. If god REALLY wanted lesbians to get pregnant, they would, too. Parthenogenesis is a remote possibility (it's been seen in every major group except for mammals and suspected in mammals), and even without parthenogenesis, Nautical's belief system allows for complete disregard of the usual natural order. Hell, if god REALLY wanted it, gay dudes could get pregnant too, because god can do, absolutely literally, anything. Ah, but you see, God already had it written down that you need a man and a woman to "be fruitful". If he starts letting lesbians get knocked up without any sperm or gay guys get pregnant, he's really going to have egg on his face. After all, he still hasn't lived down switching bats from birds to mammals and changing rabbits so they don't chew cud.
|
|