|
|
Post by rebelliousscot on Oct 23, 2009 9:07:19 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by dasfuchs on Oct 23, 2009 9:11:19 GMT -5
this should pretty much be an admission that fox news really is biased and not really news
|
|
|
|
Post by goldenpringles on Oct 23, 2009 9:52:25 GMT -5
At least the White House had the balls to speak out against Fox. Of course, the "sheep" will cry out with "Liberal BIAS!" and continue to accuse other news for "pandering to the left". Sad, sad irony...
|
|
|
|
Post by captainhooker on Oct 23, 2009 11:02:22 GMT -5
At least the White House had the balls to speak out against Fox. Of course, the "sheep" will cry out with "Liberal BIAS!" and continue to accuse other news for "pandering to the left". Sad, sad irony... that didn't take any balls, nor did it do any good fight the battles that matter imo fence sitters don't watch Fox anyway; their viewers have their minds made up already |
|
|
|
Post by captainhooker on Oct 23, 2009 11:56:06 GMT -5
my response:
Please do this.
Get out of the Republican party and let them reclaim the status they once held - as a fiscally conservative party with a desire for smaller government, not the bigoted ignorant Christian extremists it's become.
Meanwhile, all the Fox Party members can wave their Bibles and their guns in the air and rant on about Acorn and Death Panels and Socialism and those pesky queers,and no one will mistake you for someone who actually knows what they're talking about or for someone has has any interest in truly free society.
Please, show yourselves for who your really are and follow the authority that you really wish to - a news corporation owned by an Australian media mogul, funded by corporate advertising, and represented by a bunch of talking heads with zero political experience or legal education.
GO FOR IT!
|
|
|
|
Post by ltfred on Oct 23, 2009 16:21:45 GMT -5
Get out of the Republican party and let them reclaim the status they once held - as a fiscally conservative party with a desire for smaller government, not the bigoted ignorant Christian extremists it's become. There are three wings of the Republican party, and two sections to each. The wings are the Religious Reich, the Neo-con mass murderers and the Aristocrats. The worst of the three is obviously the neo-cons, because they are psychopaths and would kill hundreds of thousands of people to make themselves feel big. But next come the aristocrats. There are two kinds of aristocrats- the crazy and evil sections. The crazies are the teabaggers, Paulbots and other Randroids. The evils are the insiders changing legislation for a quick buck. But both seriously distort government economic policy; the Evils are largely responsible for the current economic crisis, for instance, and the Crazies would have it go on forever in order to pay off the det they created in good times. They might let all the homosexuals marry, but they'd not want to feed or house them. Some might allow abortion on demand, but the society they want might actually create abortion without choice. Oh no you don't. He hasn't had an Australian passport for years. Despite his devoted patriotism, he dropped citizenship as soon as he could like a ball of lava. He's American now. |
|
|
|
Post by Alexandria on Oct 23, 2009 16:54:05 GMT -5
Hmm... and which party went after Clinton for no reason other than he was making them look like idiots with balancing the budget and such? Oh right. My bad. It obviously wasn't the republican party cause they would do no such thing, GASP!
|
|
|
|
Post by ironbite on Oct 23, 2009 18:35:06 GMT -5
my response: Please do this. Get out of the Republican party and let them reclaim the status they once held - as a fiscally conservative party with a desire for smaller government, not the bigoted ignorant Christian extremists it's become. Meanwhile, all the Fox Party members can wave their Bibles and their guns in the air and rant on about Acorn and Death Panels and Socialism and those pesky queers,and no one will mistake you for someone who actually knows what they're talking about or for someone has has any interest in truly free society. Please, show yourselves for who your really are and follow the authority that you really wish to - a news corporation owned by an Australian media mogul, funded by corporate advertising, and represented by a bunch of talking heads with zero political experience or legal education. GO FOR IT! I read all that in Keith Olbermann's voice btw. |
|
|
|
Post by Art Vandelay on Oct 23, 2009 23:40:36 GMT -5
Get out of the Republican party and let them reclaim the status they once held - as a fiscally conservative party with a desire for smaller government, not the bigoted ignorant Christian extremists it's become. There are three wings of the Republican party, and two sections to each. The wings are the Religious Reich, the Neo-con mass murderers and the Aristocrats. The worst of the three is obviously the neo-cons, because they are psychopaths and would kill hundreds of thousands of people to make themselves feel big. But next come the aristocrats. There are two kinds of aristocrats- the crazy and evil sections. The crazies are the teabaggers, Paulbots and other Randroids. The evils are the insiders changing legislation for a quick buck. But both seriously distort government economic policy; the Evils are largely responsible for the current economic crisis, for instance, and the Crazies would have it go on forever in order to pay off the det they created in good times. They might let all the homosexuals marry, but they'd not want to feed or house them. Some might allow abortion on demand, but the society they want might actually create abortion without choice. Oh no you don't. He hasn't had an Australian passport for years. Despite his devoted patriotism, he dropped citizenship as soon as he could like a ball of lava. He's American now. Wow, I don't think anyone could've been more emotional if they tried. |
|
|
|
Post by Thejebusfire on Oct 24, 2009 0:27:25 GMT -5
Cheney/Palin?
My god, I'd rather live in Mexico than put up with them two in office.
|
|
|
|
Post by banjaxed on Oct 24, 2009 22:07:31 GMT -5
Cheney/Palin? My god, I'd rather live in Mexico than put up with them two in office. They would probably invade there too |
|
|
|
Post by JonathanE on Oct 25, 2009 7:33:07 GMT -5
A Cheney/Palin ticket would be a Democratic wet-dream. I bet the thought of it has them drooling. That would be disastrous for the GOP, truly disastrous. The problem would be that the polarization occuring in the U.S. now, would be greatly intensified by such a ticket, would make for unhealthy politics for years to come.
|
|
