|
Post by MaybeNever on Apr 24, 2010 18:03:26 GMT -5
The arbitrary imprisonment policies are not a 'mess'. They are a crime against humanity, (section e, Article 7, Rome Statute), unconstitutional (Boumedine et al) and completely pointless for all bar political reasons. What can you do? Well, what do you do when you arrest a guy you 'know' to be a serial killer or a child molestor, but can't prove it? What do you do if you just lose in court? You release them. Immediately. Otherwise, do not pretend to have a rule of law. We can just let them go in Afghanistan or Iraq. Hand them an AK-47, stick a full magazine in their pocket, and push them out the front gate of the army base. ;D Then we can shoot them for openly carrying a weapon near a US Army base! That will teach them a valuable lesson.
|
|
|
Post by canadian mojo on Apr 24, 2010 19:34:26 GMT -5
I've found it's best to kinda skim Fred's posts and not respond, he's like the liberal version of Skyfire True, but where's the fun in that?
|
|
|
Post by ltfred on Apr 24, 2010 21:44:54 GMT -5
The arbitrary imprisonment policies are not a 'mess'. They are a crime against humanity, (section e, Article 7, Rome Statute), unconstitutional (Boumedine et al) and completely pointless for all bar political reasons. What can you do? Well, what do you do when you arrest a guy you 'know' to be a serial killer or a child molestor, but can't prove it? What do you do if you just lose in court? You release them. Immediately. Otherwise, do not pretend to have a rule of law. We can just let them go in Afghanistan or Iraq. Hand them an AK-47, stick a full magazine in their pocket, and push them out the front gate of the army base. ;D Yes. You must do this. If and when citizen X commits a crime, you may then arrest them. Pre-crimes aren't.
|
|
|
Post by the sandman on Apr 24, 2010 22:14:14 GMT -5
We can just let them go in Afghanistan or Iraq. Hand them an AK-47, stick a full magazine in their pocket, and push them out the front gate of the army base. ;D I've found it's best to kinda skim Fred's posts and not respond, he's like the liberal version of Skyfire Huh. Maybe I'm just all mixed up right now from pitching 6 softball games, 2 Vicodin, and 6 pints of Guinness, but I seem to recall LtFred being far more Libertarian than Liberal. Or am I thinking of someone else?
|
|
|
Post by safaraz on Apr 25, 2010 12:42:21 GMT -5
We can just let them go in Afghanistan or Iraq. Hand them an AK-47, stick a full magazine in their pocket, and push them out the front gate of the army base. ;D I've found it's best to kinda skim Fred's posts and not respond, he's like the liberal version of Skyfire Oh no! someone has different opinions to me online! I must deride them to make me look smug and clever. If you actually bothered to read his post you will find that Fred raised legitimate concerns with references, rather than just making pointless comments, unlike some people...
|
|
|
Post by RavynousHunter on Apr 25, 2010 15:14:03 GMT -5
B-b-bu...pointless commentary is fun!
|
|
|
Post by DeadpanDoubter on Apr 25, 2010 16:38:22 GMT -5
Yeah!
|
|