|
Post by Tiger on Dec 2, 2010 21:15:05 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by dasfuchs on Dec 2, 2010 21:36:01 GMT -5
lol, pollution fail for the win
'course I always suspected Capt. Planet was gay
|
|
|
Post by Oriet on Dec 2, 2010 22:00:46 GMT -5
I don't think it'll get them to care about the environment at all. Instead, the only reaction I predict they'll have is claiming mercury causes homosexuality, of course completely ignoring that the sexuality (or rather factors/causes) of birds and humans is incredibly different.
|
|
|
Post by matante on Dec 3, 2010 8:21:02 GMT -5
In their mind, that'll confirm that homosexuality is a disease and that it should not be considered normal.
|
|
|
Post by Old Viking on Dec 3, 2010 18:24:36 GMT -5
I once wrote of a paint factory worker who accidentally dropped half of his tuna fish sandwich into a vat of mercury and contaminated the entire batch.
|
|
|
Post by The_L on Dec 4, 2010 7:03:59 GMT -5
I honestly think that nothing will convince the die-hard anti-environmentalists. Nothing. Even if their own homes are suddenly part of a barren wasteland due to global warming, they'll still insist that everything is hunky-dory.
|
|
|
Post by booley on Dec 4, 2010 13:49:12 GMT -5
There's been evidence that pollution messes up sex organs for decades now. A lot of fertilizers and common plastics screw up with hormones and males are particualrily vulnerable. But if cancer of the testicles and infertility won't sway them, I doubt even " the ghey!" will.
|
|