|
Post by antichrist on Apr 26, 2009 19:34:06 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by A. Sapien on Apr 26, 2009 19:50:23 GMT -5
I'll take that to mean you don't want to be a man and admit to being wrong about something. Go fuck yourself, twice. Here, to help your martyr complex. "I wash my hands of you." I'm done, your purposely misrepresenting the entire argument that's been presented for 10 pages, just to try and save face. Everyone. EVERYONE here knows this. Do you honestly think that anyone on this board doesn't think ill of you?
|
|
|
Post by mnstrm on Apr 26, 2009 20:12:12 GMT -5
Okay folks. Talked with the bishop today, and he let me look through the Handbook of Instructions for as long as I pleased... completely unattended. Does anyone else find it a little sad that Skyfire seems so proud that the bishop "let" Skyfire, an adult, look through the Handbook of Instructions "for as long as [he] pleased... completely unattended". You know, sometimes I let my 7 year old students "be in charge" of something I might normally do in class. They, I'm sure, feel proud because they're children being given a "grown up" responsibility. Just saying...
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon the Clown on Apr 26, 2009 20:37:40 GMT -5
Where there's a will, there's a way, Mr. big-boned, baby fat guy, or should I call you Cartman? Dude, not cool! Respect Cartman. He's a cunning little bastard and deserves some credit.
|
|
|
Post by Julian on Apr 26, 2009 20:59:53 GMT -5
In that case, I could easily report you to the mods for flaming. Hey dumbass. You got warned about this by at least Napoleon, and told not to threaten other posters or pollute the forums with this rubbish! PM it and/or STFU!
|
|
|
Post by ironbite on Apr 26, 2009 20:59:56 GMT -5
Hey Sky....notice how one of the mods is making fun of you.
Ironbite-man does that take me back.
|
|
|
Post by devilschaplain2 on Apr 26, 2009 21:27:15 GMT -5
So your overweight and sickly, yet they still wanted you to go on a mission but you didn't because of illness in your family. But the church said every young man must go, and you argued the entire LDS church into changing that rule (well it's been proved, not really). I bet this is what Bush sounded like when he was trying to get out of having to go to Vietnam.... ;D
|
|
|
Post by schizophonic on Apr 26, 2009 21:45:53 GMT -5
Or it means that the painter was a Mason. Interesting off topic. The statue of Lincoln is making the ASL symbols for A and L. It is believed that it was a tribute from the artist because Does the fact that the statue has ASL in it mean that Lincoln had knowledge of ASL? Paintings are not the same as photographic evidence. Occams Razor, he's around Masons, his church has masonic rituals. Choice 1: It's all a magical godly coincidence Choice 2: He was influenced by the Masons And you still have to answer whether the early church included the Masonic rituals. Unfortunately there's no proof. So what is this, are you just waiting for us all to give up so you can claim victory? Argument ad nausium? Good Demon Dog. *Throws you a bone* At least when Tom Cruise threatened to sue him it was over the making him look queer bit. Has he seen his own body of work? He makes himself look gay. And I'm totally fine sexuality. Okay folks. Talked with the bishop today, and he let me look through the Handbook of Instructions for as long as I pleased... completely unattended. That screen cap showing the material from the 2006 edition? It's only a fraction of what's on the page. The photo depicts a a third of a single column, meaning that the bulk of the relevant information was cut off. So, here's some of what was chopped off of that page: A few paragraphs down, we have this as well: Then flipping over to page 93, we have: So there you have it, folks. The scan from the 2006 edition missed the point at best and was done up deceptively at worst. Now, about those apologies...? So not only didn't you provide screens of this new edition that nobody else has seen, but you're trying to pretend these other parts are relevant. Jesus H Fictitious Christ!
|
|
|
Post by skyfire on Apr 26, 2009 22:23:26 GMT -5
Okay folks. Talked with the bishop today, and he let me look through the Handbook of Instructions for as long as I pleased... completely unattended. Does anyone else find it a little sad that Skyfire seems so proud that the bishop "let" Skyfire, an adult, look through the Handbook of Instructions "for as long as [he] pleased... completely unattended". You know, sometimes I let my 7 year old students "be in charge" of something I might normally do in class. They, I'm sure, feel proud because they're children being given a "grown up" responsibility. Just saying... Just spoofing the fact that many critics of the church - including a few who've posted here - hold the mistaken belief that somehow the Handbook is some uber-secret thing that the laity aren't even supposed to know about, let alone touch.
|
|
|
Post by skyfire on Apr 26, 2009 22:26:24 GMT -5
So not only didn't you provide screens of this new edition that nobody else has seen, but you're trying to pretend these other parts are relevant. Jesus H Fictitious Christ! Couldn't make it over to the copy machine; the door to the room was locked and I don't have a key. Otherwise, I'd have made some scans of the pages. But since a certain someone proved that he had access to the complete scans the entire time but chose to not divulge the full pages, including the parts that kinda worked against his argument,...
|
|
|
Post by A. Sapien on Apr 26, 2009 23:02:24 GMT -5
So not only didn't you provide screens of this new edition that nobody else has seen, but you're trying to pretend these other parts are relevant. Jesus H Fictitious Christ! Couldn't make it over to the copy machine; the door to the room was locked and I don't have a key. Otherwise, I'd have made some scans of the pages. But since a certain someone proved that he had access to the complete scans the entire time but chose to not divulge the full pages, including the parts that kinda worked against his argument,... Stop misrepresenting my fucking argument. My entire fucking point was that PARTICULAR SECTION. Which is why I only provided what was provided in the 99 edition, that you said was out of date. I never claimed anything else, and after 10 pages, you want to reframe the argument to turn yourself into the winner? Jesus christ, thanks for proving what we've been saying about your intellectual dishonesty. You know, Sky, considering what's said on page 92, I'm going assume that you weren't considered 'worthy' for service. Anyone want the full book? I'm happy to provide links.
|
|
|
Post by dasfuchs on Apr 26, 2009 23:27:19 GMT -5
Sky, I think your lies and assjockyness are gonna break the boards, i've not seen this much weaselin' in my life combined The old boards are still readable if you really get voyeuristic... My brain can only take so much stupidity before it shuts down. The amount of fail he's amassed in the past two days is nearly at that level I just unplug the comp and go flop on the bed to wait for death to take me...or the paramedics to revive me
|
|
|
Post by dasfuchs on Apr 26, 2009 23:41:44 GMT -5
Does anyone else find it a little sad that Skyfire seems so proud that the bishop "let" Skyfire, an adult, look through the Handbook of Instructions "for as long as [he] pleased... completely unattended". You know, sometimes I let my 7 year old students "be in charge" of something I might normally do in class. They, I'm sure, feel proud because they're children being given a "grown up" responsibility. Just saying... Just spoofing the fact that many critics of the church - including a few who've posted here - hold the mistaken belief that somehow the Handbook is some uber-secret thing that the laity aren't even supposed to know about, let alone touch. Dumbass, you did that yourself. There's some 2007 edition that no one's seen but you and your leader, right up to the point not even your own fucking church says it exists. That's why it's seen as some uber secret decoder ring type tripe. If these are fucking rules you're supposed to follow AS A FUCKING MEMBER, wouldn't you think copies should be given out to goddamned read? Are you this fucking stupid? No wonder you never went on a mission, you've done more than enough damage to your own religion and proved you don't have the mental abillity to go up against the lowest graded student of a first grade special ed class. I'll bet you ride a damned short bus that's one window long to church
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon the Clown on Apr 26, 2009 23:57:09 GMT -5
I'll bet you ride a damned short bus that's one window long to church It's called a mini-van, I believe.
|
|
|
Post by dasfuchs on Apr 27, 2009 0:24:48 GMT -5
I'll bet you ride a damned short bus that's one window long to church It's called a mini-van, I believe. they paint'em yellow and put big lights on the roof with "Mormon Speshul Edjumacationz" written on the side now?
|
|