|
|
Post by tolpuddlemartyr on Jul 27, 2011 18:36:48 GMT -5
Bill O'Reilly has done his bit to contribute to the Tsunami of stupidity coming from right-wing commentators in the wake of the Norway shootings by declaring that it's "Impossible" that Breivik could have been a Christian, because...Breivik was bad-not good, like O'Reilly. So not a Christian, get it?
|
|
|
|
Post by lighthorseman on Jul 27, 2011 18:48:56 GMT -5
If you accept that Christians are capable of these sorts of acts, then Christianity loses its inherent moral superiority over Islam. Duh. One of these things, doesn't belong here, come on, can you tell which one? |
|
|
|
Post by Rat Of Steel on Jul 27, 2011 19:21:50 GMT -5
One of these things, doesn't belong here, come on, can you tell which one? Well, it could be the third one.... ...because it's the only one not showing any kind of tartan-patterned clothing. It could also be the fourth one... ...because, with that stormtrooper helmet, it's impossible to have even the slightest idea how old that person is. (Of course, you also could be going with the easy, cop-out answer of "it's the fifth one, because only Sir Connery is awesome".  ) |
|
|
|
Post by Iosa the Invincible on Jul 27, 2011 21:05:53 GMT -5
According to someone on Christian Forums, he's not a Christian, but an atheist/agnostic.
|
|
|
|
Post by John E on Jul 27, 2011 21:22:13 GMT -5
Re: Scotsman: Ha, it took me way longer than it should have to get that joke.
|
|
|
|
Post by RavynousHunter on Jul 27, 2011 21:43:38 GMT -5
I agree with Billo on one thing, Breivik was a loser.
|
|
|
|
Post by big_electron on Jul 27, 2011 23:29:13 GMT -5
What goddamnmotherfucking difference does it make? Breivik is a killer, belief is irrelevant.
Breivik, meet Justice! Justice, meet Breivik!
|
|
|
|
Post by John E on Jul 27, 2011 23:55:23 GMT -5
It makes a difference because right wing Christian assertions that Christians are inherently good and Muslims are inherently bad effect a lot of people's beliefs and behavior, and influence politics.
|
|
|
|
Post by gyeonghwa on Jul 28, 2011 16:00:28 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Smurfette Principle on Jul 28, 2011 17:10:48 GMT -5
Reason #47646246254 to like John Stewart. ETA: Part 2. |
|
|
|
Post by Shane for Wax on Jul 28, 2011 18:21:43 GMT -5
"Impossible!" I don't think that word means what you think it means.
Also, I don't understand the Scots joke but I'm sure I should be offended.
|
|
|
|
Post by szaleniec on Jul 28, 2011 18:40:26 GMT -5
Also, I don't understand the Scots joke but I'm sure I should be offended. It's a reference to a very common logical fallacy that we're seeing in action here. |
|
|
|
Post by Shane for Wax on Jul 28, 2011 18:58:15 GMT -5
Also, I don't understand the Scots joke but I'm sure I should be offended. It's a reference to a very common logical fallacy that we're seeing in action here. Ah. I get it now. Kinda... went weird with the joke tho. |
|
|
|
Post by scotsgit on Jul 29, 2011 5:00:55 GMT -5
Ah. I get it now. Kinda... went weird with the joke tho. How can someone who's not Scottish be offended? |
|
|
|
Post by Amaranth on Jul 29, 2011 7:47:24 GMT -5
"Special" victims unit indeed.
|
|
)
