|
|
Post by Armand Tanzarian on Apr 30, 2009 12:57:49 GMT -5
You be the judge. "We don't wanna debate the consequences of gay marriage." Well I refer you to the recent debates in Maine, broadcasted over the internet, in which the pro-equality side won.
|
|
|
|
Post by deliciousdemon on Apr 30, 2009 14:30:38 GMT -5
Scholars? How vague can you get. Not impressed. What is especially hiarious is that they are doing exactly what the second lad accuses them of doing.
|
|
|
|
Post by antichrist on Apr 30, 2009 15:06:10 GMT -5
Again, look at Canada.
Where are these widespread legal conflicts? I thought it was funny that it was discovered that according to Canadian law a divorce was between a man and a woman (brief little national snicker with our first gay divorce) but that was the only legal battle I've heard.
As for the Miss CA, I don't think the question should of been asked, because there was no correct answer she could give that wouldn't piss somebody off.
|
|
|
|
Post by m52nickerson on Apr 30, 2009 15:26:35 GMT -5
She could have at least worded her answer different.......you know......so it at least she did not seem like a dumb bigot.
|
|
|
|
Post by dasfuchs on Apr 30, 2009 15:43:53 GMT -5
I love how they cut the first half out so she sounds intelligent and honest, not a confused bimbo
|
|
|
|
Post by shelly87 on Apr 30, 2009 16:05:03 GMT -5
CITATION NEEDED
Who are these scholars, what are their credibility? Not even super-fine print so I can go look up the research and prove its either a. from a biased source or b. been misinterpreted/misrepresented.
|
|
|
|
Post by shelly87 on Apr 30, 2009 16:08:34 GMT -5
Alright did some research, and no wonder they didn't put the references in the add. The original letters they got those quotes from were advocated gay marriage and were suggesting that there be exceptions for conservative religious groups so they wouldn't freak out so much over marriage equality. So were are going with b, misrepresented...good job NOM. rightwingwatch.org/content/nice-try-nom |
|
|
|
Post by devilschaplain2 on Apr 30, 2009 23:46:56 GMT -5
She could have at least worded her answer different.......you know......so it at least she did not seem like a dumb bigot. .....but she is a dumb bigot, so I'm not sure if wording matters ^_^ |
|
|
|
Post by The Lazy One on May 1, 2009 5:11:10 GMT -5
Ah, NOM. The hateful organization with the hilarious acronym. NOM NOM NOM.  What I want to know is who exactly these scholars are. |
|
|
|
Post by xaria on May 1, 2009 6:03:29 GMT -5
idiotic cunts but still they manage to be less offensive than the illionois ad.
|
|
|
|
Post by mice34 on May 1, 2009 10:00:31 GMT -5
I love the unintentionally funny names of these groups: NOM, 2M4M, teabaggers. I'd think they were Poes if I gave them enough credit to have senses of humour.  |
|
|
|
Post by erictheblue on May 1, 2009 10:13:26 GMT -5
I love the unintentionally funny names of these groups: NOM, 2M4M, teabaggers. I'd think they were Poes if I gave them enough credit to have senses of humour. I know. It still amazes me that those groups never realized the double meaning in their names - especially 2M4M! Of all the abbreviations, you would think they would know all about M4M. |
|
|
|
Post by Dragon Zachski on May 1, 2009 10:40:03 GMT -5
.......I don't know what M4M means, and now I'm scared to look it up.
But the video has been pulled because of copyright issues.
FFS NOM, she didn't lose because of her answer, she lost because she was inarticulate and lacked POISE... you know, the qualities that Miss America is supposed to have?
|
|
|
|
Post by Bezron on May 1, 2009 10:43:41 GMT -5
.......I don't know what M4M means, and now I'm scared to look it up. It means Male for Male. You know, some of that homo-goodness. |
|
|
|
Post by erictheblue on May 1, 2009 11:20:39 GMT -5
.......I don't know what M4M means bezron already answered this, but I want to add that 2M4M normally means "2 men looking for a third." |
|
