she fell out of the ugly tree, hit every ugly branch on the way down, hit the ugly ground, bounced down the ugly hill, hitting every ugly rock and tree trunk along the way, rolled into the ugly bank, landed in the ugly river, and then floated all the way down to the ugly ocean.
I think the thought of ironbite licking Caitshidhe's ears till cows came is far more disturbing than any naked flesh we could post. Sexy thoughts are universally ruined by the introduction of farm animals.
Josephus does not confirm the existence of the Historical Jesus of Nazerath purported founder of Christianity. However he does prove the existence of a number of guys who had the name Jesus prancing around the Levant. But hey it was as popular name in palestine then as it is in Mexico now.
How does the hypothesis "The Shroud of Turin is authentic" predict that it was made through short pulses of ultraviolet radiation? It doesn't.
How does the hypothesis "Jesus is the son of God" predict that one will find a shroud that had Jesus' image imprinted through ultraviolet radiation? It doesn't.
So, how does this "discovery", if legitimate, prove either of those hypothesis? It doesn't.
Bayes, bitch. Learn how it works.
Also: There's been roughly seventy bajillion studies that claim to conclusively prove or conclusively disprove the authenticity of the Shroud of Turin. To immediately jump on this one, on the same fucking day it was published, and assume it to be completely flawless is remarkably idiotic.
Science, bitch. Learn how it works.
Edited to make it clear it was in response to the video,
Last Edit: Dec 21, 2011 23:12:05 GMT -5 by Sigmaleph