|
Post by Admiral Lithp on Dec 15, 2011 23:53:46 GMT -5
I was more implying that he's so pathetic that I can actually forget we have a troll.
|
|
|
Post by mexicandruglord on Dec 21, 2011 17:17:15 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Bezron on Dec 21, 2011 17:25:46 GMT -5
Hi again MDL. Kindly peruse our rules, as you are breaking a few
|
|
|
Post by davedan on Dec 21, 2011 17:32:56 GMT -5
I'm still waiting on an explanation for the raspberries. But then I suspect that your arguments are kind of like the underpants gnomes.
|
|
|
Post by John E on Dec 21, 2011 18:00:21 GMT -5
You shouldn't use words you don't understand.
|
|
|
Post by ironbite on Dec 21, 2011 18:18:31 GMT -5
How can you prove something that doesn't exist except in fairy tales? Ironbite-you know nothing of us.
|
|
|
Post by lighthorseman on Dec 21, 2011 18:26:29 GMT -5
And the historical record, *cough* Josephus *cough, cough*
|
|
|
Post by davedan on Dec 21, 2011 18:56:15 GMT -5
Josephus does not confirm the existence of the Historical Jesus of Nazerath purported founder of Christianity. However he does prove the existence of a number of guys who had the name Jesus prancing around the Levant. But hey it was as popular name in palestine then as it is in Mexico now.
|
|
|
Post by Sigmaleph on Dec 21, 2011 20:47:25 GMT -5
Ah, the Shroud of Turin. Of course. How does the hypothesis "The Shroud of Turin is authentic" predict that it was made through short pulses of ultraviolet radiation? It doesn't. How does the hypothesis "Jesus is the son of God" predict that one will find a shroud that had Jesus' image imprinted through ultraviolet radiation? It doesn't. So, how does this "discovery", if legitimate, prove either of those hypothesis? It doesn't. Bayes, bitch. Learn how it works. Also: There's been roughly seventy bajillion studies that claim to conclusively prove or conclusively disprove the authenticity of the Shroud of Turin. To immediately jump on this one, on the same fucking day it was published, and assume it to be completely flawless is remarkably idiotic. Science, bitch. Learn how it works. Edited to make it clear it was in response to the video,
|
|
|
Post by RavynousHunter on Dec 21, 2011 20:53:51 GMT -5
Uhh...homes, you's in tha wrong thread.
|
|
|
Post by Mlle Antéchrist on Dec 21, 2011 20:55:00 GMT -5
He was referring to the link DrugLord posted.
|
|
|
Post by John E on Dec 21, 2011 22:19:59 GMT -5
And the historical record, *cough* Josephus *cough, cough* *cough* forgery *cough* And even if it isn't a forgery, the much quoted Josephus passage doesn't even assert the existence of Jesus. It asserts the existence of people who believe in Jesus, which isn't in dispute.
|
|