Tony Perkins: DADT repeal will lead to bestiality

[foolishwisdom]

In what would be defined as sore losing, Tony Perkins of Family Research Council has foreseen a negativity of the repeal. Despite the repeal happening months ago, and no significant problems have arisen, Tony has stated in an article that:

The dust is finally starting to clear over the rubble of the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" repeal, and our military is beginning to see what's on the horizon: a campaign to radicalize the country from the Pentagon out. It started by toppling the barrier to open homosexuality. And it continues with an assault on marriage and religious freedom. Now, in its rush to accommodate the Left, Congress may have inadvertently opened the door to even more perversion. As part of the Defense Authorization bill, liberals are pushing to make sodomy a legal activity under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). In its haste to make gay sex an official part of military life, the Left could be unintentionally repealing the ban on bestiality too. Article 125 of the UCMJ, which Democrats are targeting, clearly states: "Any person subject to this chapter who engages in unnatural carnal copulation with another person of the same or opposite sex or with an animal is guilty of sodomy."

How original, the old "homosexuality is about the sex" card. And he added in the bestiality card as well to boot, and it ain't even that clever; he just mentioned bestiality because the UCMJ mentions it as well. For those who wish to stomach the article, tis here (note that the article has other news, which are just a BS. Though I digress): www.frc.org/get.cfm?i=WU11K19&f=RF07B06
Spoiler: He has a bit of a hard on for the military rules; possibly because they are, not in his own words, "Christian".

[gyeonghwa]

Didn't he get owned on a debate by a gay soldier?

[Distind]

We have a saying where I'm from. A mule fucker is a mule fucker.

Seems simple enough to me.

[Vypernight]

Do they even know what the word 'Research' means?

[Meshakhad]

They keep saying that it will lead to bestiality. Do I detect hope in their voices?

[lighthorseman]

I keep hearing this sort of argument, yet the number of bestialist seems to remain vanishingly small.

[lexikon]

"Any person subject to this chapter who engages in unnatural carnal copulation with another person of the same or opposite sex or with an animal is guilty of sodomy."

So we're supposed to believe that no soldier ever had a blowjob, eh?

So ironic that he thinks liberals would cause bestiality to be legalized when liberals are much more pro-animal rights.