|
|
Post by wackadoodle on Oct 15, 2009 19:22:31 GMT -5
www.thelocal.se/22610/20091012/Bunnies are alot quicker. Its a good idea if they gotta get rid of the dead ones anyway, although it seems like some swede was just sitting at his desk thinking "How can I get animal environmentalists and renewable energy environmentalists into a fistfight?"
|
|
|
|
Post by skyfire on Oct 15, 2009 19:33:55 GMT -5
The problem with "other options," such as sterilization, is that the expenses involved in doing so can get every bit as out of hand as the population of the animals in question. If you have a small enough town or a joint with a tight budget, these alternatives may simply be out of the question.
|
|
|
|
Post by Trevelyan on Oct 15, 2009 19:50:12 GMT -5
I don't approve. =(
|
|
|
|
Post by Admiral Lithp on Oct 15, 2009 22:00:12 GMT -5
Seems like a good idea to me.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lady Renae on Oct 15, 2009 23:37:26 GMT -5
"A lot" is TWO WORDS YOU... YOU... GAHHHHHHHH!!!!!
Were I not a mod, I would explode at you right now.
|
|
|
|
Post by Art Vandelay on Oct 16, 2009 0:34:22 GMT -5
This I like. Here in Australia we have both a huge problem with rabbits (Brits thought it would be a good idea to bring them over, not a good idea to say the least) and a dependence on coal. Maybe if we can do the same with foxes and toads we'll have a solution to both our feral animal problem and dependence on coal!
|
|
|
|
Post by sithyeti on Oct 16, 2009 0:40:10 GMT -5
It is a good idea, they have to do something with the dead rabbits so why not use them for fuel.
|
|
|
|
Post by maanantai on Oct 16, 2009 12:19:21 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by malicious_bloke on Oct 16, 2009 17:58:26 GMT -5
I reckon it's a great idea, and one that is neatly scalable to society as a whole.
Commutards, gypsies, gingers, chavs, animal-rights fuckwits...im sure there's a lot of chemical energy neatly stored in these monstrously mutated subhumans just begging to be transferred into useful, clean, productive energy.
|
|
