|
|
Post by Runa on Jun 7, 2011 18:32:43 GMT -5
Except for Juliar...
*facepalm*
Can we all move to Europe, please?
|
|
|
|
Post by Old Viking on Jun 7, 2011 18:34:02 GMT -5
Share the fun.
|
|
|
|
Post by ltfred on Jun 7, 2011 22:54:23 GMT -5
Political correctness is better known by it's older name, non-racism. Sorry, i hear this PC babble from islamophobes in europe enough! "It's not the muslims, it's islam"..." What is this I don't even? Islamophobes typically hate political correctness (non-racist language). They typically use bullshit pseudo justifications for their use of racist language (and bigoted policies) No, they don't. You can't say a lot of things. For instance, you're not allowed to slander or libel people. Whaaaaa? |
|
SweetZombieJesus
New Member
Liberal Christian and amateur experimental theologian.
Posts: 38
|
Post by SweetZombieJesus on Jun 8, 2011 1:38:16 GMT -5
It's starting to look like Teabaggerism is some sort of contagious disease. Quick, quarantine Europe before it's too late!  |
|
|
|
Post by Thejebusfire on Jun 8, 2011 10:33:12 GMT -5
McDonalds causes more health problems than homosexuality. Should we ban all McDonalds?
|
|
chagen
Junior Member
Not Banned
Posts: 71
|
Post by chagen on Jun 8, 2011 10:46:44 GMT -5
I actually agree with some of this. Not all of it is good, but some of it is respectable.
Too bad the liberals on this board are too enamored in their own self-righteousness (AKA "Bullshit") to see that. Oh well. I am one of the few conservatives on this board, after all.
|
|
|
|
Post by Thejebusfire on Jun 8, 2011 10:49:23 GMT -5
Several of the board members also agree with some of this. They do make some good points. But some of it is just BS.
|
|
chagen
Junior Member
Not Banned
Posts: 71
|
Post by chagen on Jun 8, 2011 10:54:47 GMT -5
"We are opposed to a dual legal system, i.e. we oppose introduction of Sharia law in Australia. We will educate people about the implications of radical Islamic teaching. We advocate no Centrelink benefits for polygamists."
This is all good. Not sure why most people oppose it.
You should not bring backwards and outdated religious law into a secular court system. EVER.
Why do liberals fawn all over Sharia, and then scream and moan whenever Christianity tries to influence the law? Both should not be tolerated in an impartial and secular court system.
|
|
|
|
Post by VirtualStranger on Jun 8, 2011 10:59:15 GMT -5
"We are opposed to a dual legal system, i.e. we oppose introduction of Sharia law in Australia. We will educate people about the implications of radical Islamic teaching. We advocate no Centrelink benefits for polygamists." This is all good. Not sure why most people oppose it. You should not bring backwards and outdated religious law into a secular court system. EVER. Why do liberals fawn all over Sharia, and then scream and moan whenever Christianity tries to influence the law? Both should not be tolerated in an impartial and secular court system. Sharia law already DOESN'T influence secular law, and almost nobody is trying to make it that way. The idiots screaming about "The radical Muslims trying to take over the country with their radical agenda" are suffering from a major persecution complex. It's nothing more than thinly veiled Islamophobia. Opposing a movement that doesn't exist is idiotic. |
|
|
|
Post by Vene on Jun 8, 2011 11:00:33 GMT -5
"We are opposed to a dual legal system, i.e. we oppose introduction of Sharia law in Australia. We will educate people about the implications of radical Islamic teaching. We advocate no Centrelink benefits for polygamists." This is all good. Not sure why most people oppose it. You should not bring backwards and outdated religious law into a secular court system. EVER. Why do liberals fawn all over Sharia, and then scream and moan whenever Christianity tries to influence the law? Both should not be tolerated in an impartial and secular court system. The whole Sharia thing is a complete red herring used to fan xenophobia. No western government is going to adopt Sharia law, being concerned about Sharia is stupid and paranoid. It is nothing but a pointless exercise that pits citizens of a country against each other. Modern McCarthyism. |
|
chagen
Junior Member
Not Banned
Posts: 71
|
Post by chagen on Jun 8, 2011 11:02:26 GMT -5
"We are opposed to a dual legal system, i.e. we oppose introduction of Sharia law in Australia. We will educate people about the implications of radical Islamic teaching. We advocate no Centrelink benefits for polygamists." This is all good. Not sure why most people oppose it. You should not bring backwards and outdated religious law into a secular court system. EVER. Why do liberals fawn all over Sharia, and then scream and moan whenever Christianity tries to influence the law? Both should not be tolerated in an impartial and secular court system. The whole Sharia thing is a complete red herring used to fan xenophobia. No western government is going to adopt Sharia law, being concerned about Sharia is stupid and paranoid. It is nothing but a pointless exercise that pits citizens of a country against each other. Modern McCarthyism. Really? Because I thought that Islamists were trying to get it implemented into law. And in any case, what about so-called Sharia courts being set up. Do we just ignore them and let a women get stoned for adultery because she was raped? |
|
|
|
Post by Damen on Jun 8, 2011 11:03:03 GMT -5
Too bad the liberals on this board are too enamored in their own self-righteousness (AKA "Bullshit") to see that. Oh well. I am one of the few conservatives on this board, after all. Oh you poor persecuted little conservative. Here, let me tuck you in and fix you some coco and don't worry, I'll check under the bed and in the closet for the Hippy Boogyman. Seriously, cut it with the oppressed minority shit. |
|
|
|
Post by Vene on Jun 8, 2011 11:03:27 GMT -5
The whole Sharia thing is a complete red herring used to fan xenophobia. No western government is going to adopt Sharia law, being concerned about Sharia is stupid and paranoid. It is nothing but a pointless exercise that pits citizens of a country against each other. Modern McCarthyism. Really? Because I thought that Islamists were trying to get it implemented into law. And in any case, what about so-called Sharia courts being set up. Do we just ignore them and let a women get stoned for adultery because she was raped? Where? Give me a goddamn link. Give me an example of this happening someplace like Australia, the US, Canada, or the UK. ETA: I don't know about the other nations, but here in the States, Sharia law is already outlawed due to the first amendment. |
|
chagen
Junior Member
Not Banned
Posts: 71
|
Post by chagen on Jun 8, 2011 11:05:18 GMT -5
Really? Because I thought that Islamists were trying to get it implemented into law. And in any case, what about so-called Sharia courts being set up. Do we just ignore them and let a women get stoned for adultery because she was raped? Where? Give me a goddamn link. Give me an example of this happening someplace like Australia, the US, Canada, or the UK. ETA: I don't know about the other nations, but here in the States, Sharia law is already outlawed due to the first amendment. ...To be honest, I've only seen unreliable places like Fox talk about this. But that's all my dad ever gives me, and I don't care about news in the first place, so it's not like I ever check the news for stuff. |
|
|
|
Post by Damen on Jun 8, 2011 11:13:14 GMT -5
Where? Give me a goddamn link. Give me an example of this happening someplace like Australia, the US, Canada, or the UK. ETA: I don't know about the other nations, but here in the States, Sharia law is already outlawed due to the first amendment. ...To be honest, I've only seen unreliable places like Fox talk about this. But that's all my dad ever gives me, and I don't care about news in the first place, so it's not like I ever check the news for stuff. You know, Chagen, if you weren't trolling for a ban, I'd suggest you do a little research before making blanket statements like "liberals fawn over Sharia law" and then come back with sources to support your argument (aside from Fox news which has as much credibility as Fred Phelps). But because of your transparent "BAN ME!" attempts... ...you know what? I'm still gonna ask you for sources. Cite them, please. |
|
