Santorum: Gov't should be bias towards gays

[foolishwisdom]

Yes that's right, Rick "I dare you to Google his name" Santorum believes that the government should...

...have a bias, a bias in favor of what is best for society, a bias in favor of what is proven to be best for children, which is the future of society.

thinkprogress.org/lgbt/2011/07/18/271548/santorum-bias-married-opposite-sex-couples/

Ah yes, it's the children, always about the children. Though to his credit, at risk of causing a double topic on this thread, this is the closest people of his nature (Good Christian™ Republicans) have ever come to caring for the children outside the womb...

Now granted he doesn't specifically say anything about same-sex marriages, let alone gays in general. But I think it's obvious who Sanatorium wants the government to disfavor.

[gyeonghwa]

...have a bias, a bias in favor of what is best for society, a bias in favor of what is proven to be best for children, which is the future of society.

So having 2+ parents, regardless of gender? That's what the data says.

[devilschaplain2]

He compared homosexuality to "man on dog" sex, so this does not surprise me.

[Amaranth]

I think about the children all the time. For example, do they go better with white or red wine?

[booley]

Jul 18, 2011 12:21:42 GMT -5 @foolishwisdom said:

Yes that's right, Rick "I dare you to Google his name"...

Say what you will, the man lives up to his name.

[nickiknack]

Go back to your wannabe Dugger clan and STFU Rick...

[malicious_bloke]

Santorum

Another reason to love the internet

[nickiknack]

Jul 18, 2011 16:28:03 GMT -5 malicious_bloke said:

Santorum

Another reason to love the internet

And we can thank Dan Savage for it...he's a fucking genius
;D

[Haseen]

Jul 18, 2011 12:21:42 GMT -5 @foolishwisdom said:

Ah yes, it's the children, always about the children. Though to his credit, at risk of causing a double topic on this thread, this is the closest people of his nature (Good Christian™ Republicans) have ever come to caring for the children outside the womb...

Yes, that is unless they're gay children, in which case they shall be tortured until they pretend to be heterosexual.

[lighthorseman]

Jul 18, 2011 12:28:39 GMT -5 gyeonghwa said:

...have a bias, a bias in favor of what is best for society, a bias in favor of what is proven to be best for children, which is the future of society.

So having 2+ parents, regardless of gender? That's what the data says.

Obviously he means what the data SHOULD say, rather than what the data, you know, actually says.