|
Post by Magnizeal on Oct 5, 2011 18:22:51 GMT -5
So, now an accent means you're not fluent in English? If you want the full story, it's right here.
|
|
|
Post by Admiral Lithp on Oct 5, 2011 18:34:01 GMT -5
I'm sorry, but I agree. If it were an older class? Or one focused more on writing than speech? Sure. They should know basic pronunciation. But K-2 is an age range where you're picking up the language yourself & may be plagued with speech problems already.
So, assuming there was a severe enough accent, I don't think that person should be teaching young children English.
|
|
|
Post by Kit Walker on Oct 5, 2011 19:20:37 GMT -5
Last year, I had a college professor who had immigrated here from China. Intelligent woman, knew the material backwards and forwards...but sometimes her accent made her a bit tough to understand. Having her teach any lower than high school would be somewhat unwise, because if adults have trouble understanding her sometimes then children are damn sure going to have trouble. It doesn't make her not fluent, it doesn't make her a bad educator. It makes her ill suited for certain levels of student.
That said, I doubt Arizona was employing this policy in a way any more complex than 'Fucking Mexicans, man. Am I right?"
|
|
|
Post by N. De Plume on Oct 5, 2011 19:36:05 GMT -5
Right. The fact that this teacher’s accent was not a problem until only recently suggests shenanigans.
And isn’t the the/da thing a feature of certain regional United States accents?
|
|
|
Post by ltfred on Oct 5, 2011 19:47:51 GMT -5
So, assuming there was a severe enough accent, I don't think that person should be teaching young children English. Then you've got to ban virtually everyone from teaching english. Only Oxford professors have no accent. It's particularly rich for Southern Americans to accuse other people of having an accent. The nerve!
|
|
|
Post by Admiral Lithp on Oct 5, 2011 20:08:40 GMT -5
Invalid conclusion. For multiple reasons. The difference between learning common & professional English, the fact that I explicitly said "severe enough," the fact that I'm SPECIFICALLY referring to a certain age group & you're making no such distinction....
|
|
|
Post by ltfred on Oct 5, 2011 20:17:14 GMT -5
Invalid conclusion. For multiple reasons. The difference between learning common & professional English, the fact that I explicitly said "severe enough," the fact that I'm SPECIFICALLY referring to a certain age group & you're making no such distinction.... Well, okay. Then you've got to train a lot more people in Oxford English pronunciation, even if they're only going to teach all America's children good English or even just people who don't speak it as a first language. In the meantime, people with typically severe, ugly accents should refrain from firing other people for having a severe (typically less ugly) accent.
|
|
|
Post by Thejebusfire on Oct 5, 2011 21:42:25 GMT -5
I have no problem as long as I can understand what they are saying.
|
|
|
Post by N. De Plume on Oct 5, 2011 23:16:11 GMT -5
When I was in college, a high percentage of the grad students were from out of country. As a result, part of the TA evaluation us undergrads had to fill out at the end of semester included questions on the TA’s ability to speak English clearly.
I can’t say I ever really had a problem with any of them.
|
|
|
Post by sylvana on Oct 6, 2011 1:39:08 GMT -5
Well, okay. Then you've got to train a lot more people in Oxford English pronunciation, even if they're only going to teach all America's children good English or even just people who don't speak it as a first language. In the meantime, people with typically severe, ugly accents should refrain from firing other people for having a severe (typically less ugly) accent. Let me be blunt, Ameircans have the absolute worst pronunciation of English words of any English speaking nation. However, Admiral Lithp is right. Young children learn how to pronounce English words mainly by mimicking what they hear. It would be unwise to have anyone with a particularly strong accent teaching young children (this includes people from the south as well as some local dialects of the UK)
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon the Clown on Oct 6, 2011 4:16:13 GMT -5
Well, okay. Then you've got to train a lot more people in Oxford English pronunciation, even if they're only going to teach all America's children good English or even just people who don't speak it as a first language. In the meantime, people with typically severe, ugly accents should refrain from firing other people for having a severe (typically less ugly) accent. Let me be blunt, Ameircans have the absolute worst pronunciation of English words of any English speaking nation. Blunt and arrogant are not synonyms. American accents have an enormous degree of variation. Not all of them talk like they're from the Bronx. Not all of them sound like they're from the Deep South. Most of them have an accent you wouldn't even be able to discern just where it's from. Could be Canada. But hey, don't let nuances get in the way of your sweeping generalizations. There is no cockney accent in the UK! Just the proper London, upper-class accent. Exactly as the English language was first conceived! Oh, wait. English doesn't have a standardized pronunciation and is filled with instances where the general trends are completely and totally ignored or outright upside down. Because a child only picks up the foreign sounding accents, not the speaking patterns that they most often hear. Such as those of friends, family, school mates, and random strangers. It's just that one person that talks funny. Pip pip, cheerio.
|
|
|
Post by Kit Walker on Oct 6, 2011 8:21:17 GMT -5
However, Admiral Lithp is right. Young children learn how to pronounce English words mainly by mimicking what they hear. It would be unwise to have anyone with a particularly strong accent teaching young children (this includes people from the south as well as some local dialects of the UK) Well that's just asinine. The problem isn't the kids developing the teacher's accent, it is being able to understand the teacher. Take that professor of mine I mentioned - she pronounced all her Vs as Ws. This was not too big an issue for college students, as we could figure out what she meant by "non-werbal" communication. For a group who were trying to expand their "wocabularly", she might not be the greatest educator. But I had a math teacher in high school who spoke with a distinct southern twang and was perfectly understandable. It is, and I know this sounds bad, the non-native accents that would cause problems, not the ones the kids will be growing up around.
|
|
|
Post by Mlle Antéchrist on Oct 6, 2011 8:48:28 GMT -5
Under that logic, I should have picked up my dad's English/Aussie mix accent to some degree, being that I most certainly spent a lot of time around him during my formative years -- more time than I spent around any one particular teacher. Yet I speak like a typical Canadian.
Additionally, it's unfair to label a particular English-speaking accent as "bad pronunciation" when the proper pronunciation of terms is a heavily subjective matter.
|
|
|
Post by N. De Plume on Oct 6, 2011 9:12:59 GMT -5
Additionally, it's unfair to label a particular English-speaking accent as "bad pronunciation" when the proper pronunciation of terms is a heavily subjective matter. Indeed. What’s so good about Oxford English that makes it better than Rural Alabama English? Perhaps Rural Alabama has improved on the language and is the pinnacle of English.
|
|
|
Post by Armand Tanzarian on Oct 6, 2011 9:19:43 GMT -5
I'm bidialectic; I speak with a somewhat standard Midwestern American accent with a smattering of Fargoism AND I speak Manglish. Depending on which accent I speak in I have pretty good English or terrible english. So which one is it?
|
|