|
Post by Armand Tanzarian on Jul 17, 2011 9:56:27 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by scotsgit on Jul 17, 2011 10:14:02 GMT -5
So she can't answer MP's questions in a public forum because it would hurt an ongoing investigation, meanwhile the Met drags its heels in its own investigation?
Why do I feel this isn't going the way it should?
|
|
|
Post by Armand Tanzarian on Jul 17, 2011 10:28:26 GMT -5
So she can't answer MP's questions in a public forum because it would hurt an ongoing investigation, meanwhile the Met drags its heels in its own investigation? Why do I feel this isn't going the way it should? Because, in a sense, we're hoping for the very people who actually had a hand in the scandal (the police and the politicians) to actually punish the News Corp idiots. Why must they do their jobs quickly, especially for the bobbies, who aren't exactly accountable to the people of England?
|
|
|
Post by chad sexington on Jul 17, 2011 20:10:48 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by scotsgit on Jul 18, 2011 11:44:26 GMT -5
So she can't answer MP's questions in a public forum because it would hurt an ongoing investigation, meanwhile the Met drags its heels in its own investigation? Why do I feel this isn't going the way it should? Because, in a sense, we're hoping for the very people who actually had a hand in the scandal (the police and the politicians) to actually punish the News Corp idiots. Why must they do their jobs quickly, especially for the bobbies, who aren't exactly accountable to the people of England? Well the Police and Politicians are accountable to the people of the UK: Politicians can lose their seat at a by-election (as happened with the Cash for Questions scandal) and the Police ultimately have to answer to the Home Office. Newscorp can be made to answer by putting pressure on their assets in this country, although I doubt that'll happen.
|
|
|
Post by Shane for Wax on Jul 18, 2011 16:10:59 GMT -5
|
|
ottery
New Member
Otterly delicious
Posts: 23
|
Post by ottery on Jul 18, 2011 17:48:41 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by ironbite on Jul 18, 2011 18:10:46 GMT -5
That's not suspicious at all.
|
|
|
Post by scotsgit on Jul 18, 2011 18:24:28 GMT -5
That's not suspicious at all. Neither was David Kelly. And that's official. Ironbite, start the fucking car, we're getting the fuck out of here RIGHT NOW!
|
|
|
Post by tiado on Jul 18, 2011 21:23:35 GMT -5
That's not suspicious at all. No, it's not suspicious at all that a whistleblower has died mere days before he was scheduled to testify. I'd almost bet that he was found bound, with several gunshot wounds to the back of his head. The official story will rule it a "suicide".
|
|
|
Post by malicious_bloke on Jul 19, 2011 3:22:26 GMT -5
If it is a conspiracy, they are very definitely doing it wrong.
For a shady, omnipotent [ZOMFG] CORPORASHUN to let it's nefarious dealings be splattered all over rival media is just too pathetically ham-fisted.
If I was being cynical, I'd say the daily mail or guardian bumped Sean Hoare off just to send the conspiritards into overdrive...
|
|
|
Post by chad sexington on Jul 19, 2011 3:52:03 GMT -5
Big inquiry today! And LulzSec threatening to release dozens of potentially incriminating emails from the Sun. What a time to be alive...
|
|
|
Post by Shane for Wax on Jul 19, 2011 4:19:19 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by malicious_bloke on Jul 19, 2011 4:53:22 GMT -5
The Sun's readership generally have no idea about the correct usage of such grammatical niceties.
|
|
|
Post by malicious_bloke on Jul 19, 2011 4:57:30 GMT -5
Well, I guess now I'm going to need a popcorn refill.
This saga just keeps getting funnier.
|
|