|
|
Post by Yaezakura on Aug 31, 2011 5:07:16 GMT -5
While I'm about as anti-PETA as you can get... really, this person seems just as insane to me. It's hard to appreciate anyone who takes such a condescending tone towards people with a practical outlook on the usage of animal products. |
|
|
|
Post by Amaranth on Aug 31, 2011 8:26:24 GMT -5
I totally smirked at this: PREACH ON! |
|
|
|
Post by Amaranth on Aug 31, 2011 8:29:07 GMT -5
PETA: Where animals should have rights, but women shouldn't. Silly. Women ARE animals. They're just lesser animals. |
|
|
|
Post by Tiberius on Aug 31, 2011 8:41:11 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by John E on Aug 31, 2011 8:48:23 GMT -5
PETA: Where animals should have rights, but women shouldn't. Silly. Women ARE animals. They're just lesser animals. Silly, there ARE no lesser animals. If it has a rudimentary nervous system, it deserves the same moral consideration as a human. |
|
|
|
Post by Amaranth on Aug 31, 2011 8:52:34 GMT -5
Silly. Women ARE animals. They're just lesser animals. Silly, there ARE no lesser animals. If it has a rudimentary nervous system, it deserves the same moral consideration as a human. Unless it's female. I'm reminded of a "protest" that happened downtown back when we were the "naked town." I don't know for sure it was PETA, but I think it was. There were two "naked" girls in the park holding signs protesting fur. I say "naked," because they carefully concealed the fact that they were wearing bikini bottoms. Either way, it was rather silly, but it got a lot of attention. |
|
|
|
Post by Iosa the Invincible on Aug 31, 2011 11:07:05 GMT -5
Doesn't surprise me. Ingrid Newkirk (president and co-founder of PETA) is a self professed media whore. She (and PETA supporters) excuses it by saying it attracts attention to the plight of animals, completely ignoring the fact that making yourself into arrogant, self-righteous, insane dumbasses makes your cause look arrogant, self-righteous, and insane.
|
|
|
|
Post by malicious_bloke on Aug 31, 2011 11:11:35 GMT -5
Oddly, this is probably going to have the opposite effect of what they were hoping for.
It's the perfect place if your hobbies include animal cruelty, masturbation [and the interface thereof].
|
|
|
|
Post by Thejebusfire on Aug 31, 2011 11:18:28 GMT -5
That person seems very angry. |
|
|
|
Post by Amaranth on Aug 31, 2011 12:39:32 GMT -5
That person seems very angry. It's the lack of meat. It makes people ornery. |
|
|
|
Post by HarleyThomas1002 on Aug 31, 2011 13:33:17 GMT -5
I actually tried to find that because it seemed kinda funny. Didn't work. |
|
|
|
Post by Tiberius on Aug 31, 2011 17:58:45 GMT -5
I actually tried to find that because it seemed kinda funny. Didn't work. It's an arcade game, so you would need an arcade emulator. There are a couple videos of it on youtube, though. |
|
|
|
Post by junastarrider on Aug 31, 2011 18:20:34 GMT -5
While I don't think Porn is a "Misogynist Ploy to Subjugate Women" I really wish PETA would use some men in their protests. That way, at least they could cover their ass when the anti-porno people complain. And, perhaps appeal to the aprox. 50% of people who like 'Beefy Men".
Unless they already do, and the media ignores it....
|
|
|
|
Post by HarleyThomas1002 on Aug 31, 2011 20:01:31 GMT -5
A guy with lettuce covering his dick doesn't do the same for rating like a woman wearing a lettuce two-piece.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dragon Zachski on Aug 31, 2011 20:17:47 GMT -5
While I don't think Porn is a "Misogynist Ploy to Subjugate Women" I really wish PETA would use some men in their protests. That way, at least they could cover their ass when the anti-porno people complain. And, perhaps appeal to the aprox. 50% of people who like 'Beefy Men". And then the homophobes would start napalming their PETA protests. Because, you know, a scantily clad woman is sexy, a scantily clad man is "gay". I'm not joking, either, look at reactions to either and you get men acting like everything is targetted towards them. If it's a sexy male, then the picture is "gay". If it's a sexy woman, then it's "hot". |
|
